با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن مدیریت دولتی ایران و انجمن مدیریت رفتار سازمانی

نوع مقاله : توصیفی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

2 استاد گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.

3 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی ، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

چکیده

هدف مطالعۀ حاضر، بررسی راهکارهای ارتقای امکان‌پذیری و قابلیت‌پذیری سیاسی، اداری، اجتماعی و فنی خط‌مشی‌های عمومی دولت در حوزۀ آموزش عالی کشور با استفاده از رویکرد خط‌مشی‌گذاری مبتنی بر شواهد است. از لحاظ روش‌شناسی تحقیق حاضر جزء تحقیقات پیمایشی (غیر آزمایشی) بوده و اطلاعات تحقیق با  استفاده از پرسشنامه گردآوری شده است. نتایج حاصل از تحلیل داده‌های گردآوری شده از 140 خط‌مشی‌گذار و کارشناس حوزۀ آموزش عالی کشور نشان می‌دهد که استفاده از شواهد آماری در تدوین، اجرا و ارزیابی خط‌مشی‌های دولت در حوزۀ آموزش عالی، سبب بهبود قابلیت‌پذیری و امکان‌پذیری سیاسی، اجتماعی، اداری و فنی این خط‌مشی‌ها می‌شود و به روز نبودن آمارها و اطلاعات، دسترسی سخت به آمارها و اطلاعات، عدم انتشار به موقع آمارها، قابل فهم نبودن آمارهای تولید شده، عدم امکان مقایسۀ آمارهای موجود با آمارهای قبلی و ... از ‌مهم‌ترین مسائل و مشکلات به کارگیری رویکرد خط‌مشی‌گذاری مبتنی بر شواهد آماری است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation of Solutions to Improve the Political, Social, Administrative and Technical Feasibility of Public Policies Through Evidence-based Policy Making Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hasan Danayi fard 1
  • Adel Azar 2
  • Seyyed Abbas Ebrahimi 3

چکیده [English]

 The purpose of this study is to investigate solutions to improvement of social, political, technical and administrative feasibility and assessment of the government's public policies in area of high education through evidence-based policy making approach.  In terms of methodology, this study is a survey (non-experimental) one. The data was collected through a questionnaire. Results from analysis of collected data from 140 policy makers and higher education experts revealed that utilizing statistical evidence in compiling, executing and evaluating the government's policies in area of higher education makes improvement of political, technical and administrative feasibility and assessment of these policies. Moreover, lack of up-to-dated information and statistical evidence, difficult access to them, lack of on-time statistics' broadcasting, incomprehensible produced statistics, and lack of possibility of comparing available statistic with previous ones and etc. are the most important problems and difficulties of utilizing statistical evidence-based policy making approach.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Policy Making
  • Evidence-based policy making
  • Public ward
  • Statistics
Banks, G.AO (2009)." Challenges of Evidence-Based  Policy-Making", Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia.
Bulmer, M.; E. Coates & L. Dominian (2007). “Evidence-Based Policy Making”, In H. Bochel & S. Duncan (Ed.). Making Policy in Theory and Practice (P.87-103), Bristol, Policy
Cabinet Office (1999)." Modernizing Government White Paper", London, UK: The Stationery Office.
Cable, V. (2004)." Evidence and UK Politics, Does Evidence Matter? Presentation as Part of a ODI, Meeting Series on Does Evidence Matter?", London, UK.
Coulombe, H. & A. McKay (2003). "Changes in Poverty and Inequality in a Slow Growth Environment: Ghana over the 1990s", Unpublished Paper for the World Bank.
Davies (2004). “Is Evidence-Based Government Possible?”, Jerry Lee Lecture, Presented at the 4th Annual Campbell Collaboration Colloquium, Washington DC.
Davies, H.T.O.; S.M. Nutley & P.C. Smith (2000). "What Works? Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in Public Services", Bristol, The Policy Press.
 Dunn, William (1981). "Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction", Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Gray, J.A.M. (1997). "Evidence-Based Healthcare: How to Make Health Policy and Management".
Hair, J.; C.M. Ringle & M. Sarstedt (2011). “PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet”, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, ol.19; No.2: 139-151.
Hornby, P. & H.S.R. Perera (2002). “A Development Framework for Promoting Evidence Based Policy Action: Drawing on Experiences in Sri Lanka”, The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 17(2): 165-183.
Howlett, M. & M. Ramesh (2003). "Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems", Oxford University Press.
IMF (2002). "Malawi-The Food Crisis, the Strategic Grain Reserve, and the IMF: A Factsheet", July.
Kiregyera, B. (2001). "Advocacy For Statistics And Statistical Government, Paper Presented at the Paris21 Workshop for East Africa and The Horn on “Supporting Development Policy with Statistics”, Kampala, Uganda, 23-26 July.
Kraft, Michael F. & Scott R. Furlong (2010). "Public Policy: Politics, Analysis, and Alternatives", CQ Press.
Marston, G. & R. Watts (2003). “Tampering with the Evidence: A Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Policy
Othman, A. (2005). The Role of Statistics in Factual-Based Policy-Making”, National Statistics Conference 2005 Organized by the Department of Statistics, Malaysia on 19-20 September.
Scott, C. (2005). "Measuring Up to the Measurement Problem: The Role of Statistics-in-Evidence-Based Policymaking", Proceedings of the 2005 CBMS Network Meeting.
Shaxson, L. (2005). “Is your Evidence Robust Enough? Questions for Policy Makers and Practitioners”, A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, Policy Press, 1(1): 101-111.
Simons, H. (2003). “Evidence-Based Practice: Panacea or Over Promise?”, Research Papers in Education, 18(4): 303-311.
Young, K.; D. Ashby, A. Boaz & L.Grayson (2002). “Social Science and the Evidence Based Policy Movement”, Social Policy and Society, 1: 215-224.
Making”, The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 3(3): 143‐163.
Moseley, A. & S. Tierney (2004). “Evidence Based Practice in the Real World. Policy Press Evidence and Policy”, A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 1(1): 113-120.
 Nutley, S.; H. Davies & I. Walter (2002). "Evidence Based Policy and Practice: Cross Sectors Lessons from the UK. ESRC UK .