با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن مدیریت دولتی ایران و انجمن مدیریت رفتار سازمانی

نوع مقاله : اکتشافی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه پیام نور،تهران، ایران

2 استاد مدیریت دولتی (گرایش منابع انسانی)، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

4 استادیار مدیریت منابع انسانی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

تحقیق حاضر با رویکرد آمیخته اکتشافی(کیفی-کمّی)درصدد طراحی مدل مدیریت استراتژیک منابع انسانی با رویکرد سیستم های کاری با عملکرد بالااست که در شرکت های دانش بنیان انطباق پذیری دارد. به همین منظور در این تحقیق 34 بُعد اصلی از ادبیات موضوع استخراج و از طریق اجرای روش دلفی و با حضور نخبگان دانشگاهی و خبرگان شرکت های دانش بنیان به اجماع گذاشته شد که در نهایت با حذف 4بُعد واضافه شدن 3 بُعد جدید توسط اعضاء پانلها، 33 بُعد به عنوان ابعاد نهایی مدل شناسایی گردیدکه شامل مفاهیم سیستم های کاری با عملکرد بالا، عملکردسازمانی، دستاورد های مدیریت منابع انسانی و استراتژی های رقابتی بودند. نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد که سیستم های کاری با عملکرد بالا، بر عملکرد شرکتهای دانش بنیان بطور مستقیم تأثیر مثبت دارند. همچنین بسته ی سیستم های کاری با عملکرد بالا بر دستاوردهای منابع انسانی شامل سرمایه انسانی، تعهد سازمانی و رضایت مندی نیز اثرات مثبت داشته و از طریق آنها نیز بر عملکرد سازمانی اثر غیر مستقیم دارد از سوی دیگر آزمونهای انجام شده نقش تعدیل کنندگی استراتژیهای رقابتی تمایز وتمرکز را نشان نداد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing and explaining the strategic HRM model with a high-performance work system approach (Case Study of Knowledge Based Companies).

نویسندگان [English]

  • Jamshid Abolfathi 1
  • Reza Rasouli 2
  • Majid Zamahani 3
  • Mehrdad Estiri 4

1 Ph.D Condidate of public Management, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor of public Management (Human Resource Orienteering), Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor of public Management, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

4 Assistant Professor of Human Resources Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

With a mixed exploratory approach (qualitative- quantitative), the present study aims to design a model for strategic human resource management with high-performance work systems. For this purpose, 34 main themes of the subject literature were extracted and consensus was established through the implementation of the Delphi method, with the participation of academic elites and knowledge-based knowledge companies. Finally, by deleting 4 dimensions of the 3 new dimensions by panel members, 33 Then, it was identified as the final concepts which includes concepts high-performance work systems, organization performance, achievements of human resource and competition strategies. The results showed that high-performance work systems have a positively direct impact on the knowledge-based companies. Also the package of high-performance work systems has a positively direct effect on the achievements of human resource through which the organization performance is indirectly affected. However, the moderating role of the competition strategies of differentiation and focus was not affirmed.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • model design
  • human resource strategic management
  • knowledge based companies
  • High performance work systems
مقیمی، سید محمد (1392). مدیریت رفتار سازمانی. تهران: سازمان مدیریت صنعتی.
Armstrong, C., Flood, P. C., Guthrie, J. P., Liu, W.,  MacCurtain, S. & Mkamwa, T. (2010). “The impact of diversity and equality management on firm performance: Beyond high performance work systems”. Human Resource Management, 49(6), 977-998.
Armstrong, M. & Taylor, S. (2014). Armstrong's handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page Publishers.
Arendes, L. (2015). understanding the association between high performance work systems and organisational performance, Masters Of Business Administration. Gordon Institute of Business Science, University Of Pretoria.
Bartlett, C. (2014). “Talent management and high performance work system”. Journal of International Studies, 7(1), 2014, 102-108.
Block, B. J. & Pickl, S. (2014). The mystery of job performance: a system dynamics model of human behaviour. In Proceedings of the 32nd international conference of the System Dynamics Society, Delft, Netherlands, July (20-24).
Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A. & Ketchen, D. (2006). “How much do high.performance work practices matter? A meta.analysis of their effects on organizational performance”.  Personnel psychology, 59(3), 501-528.
Chin, W. W. (1998). “The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling”. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.
David, F. R. (2011). Strategic management: Concepts and case. Peaeson/Prentice Hall.
Demortier, A. L. P., Delobbe, N. & El Akremi, A. (2014). Opening the black box of hr practices-performance relationship: Testing a three pathways AMO model. In Academy of Management Proceedings (1, 14932). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510-Academy of Management.
Do, H., Budhwar, P. S. & Patel, C. (2016). Examining the Effectiveness of Trust as a Mechanism between HPWS, Creativity & Performance. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2016, No. 1, p. 12628). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
Dutch, M. (2004). Applying an expanded contingency perspective to assess the appropriateness of SHRM. Best practices, Ph.D thesis, University of Houston.
Flood, P. C., Mkamwa, T., O’Regan, C., Guthrie, J., Liu, W., Armstrong, C. & MacCurtain, S. (2008). New models of high performance work systems: The business case for strategic HRM, partnership and diversity and equality systems, Dublin, National Centre for Partnership & Performance.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error”. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
 García, J. A. M. & Tomas, J. M. (2016). “Deconstructing AMO framework: a systematic review”. In Intangible Capital, 12(4), 1040-1087).
Guchait, P. (2007). Human resource management practices and organizational commitment and intention to leave: the mediating role of perceived organizational support and psychological contracts. Degree Master of Science, University of Missouri-Columbia.
Heffernan, M., & Dundon, T. (2012, July). Researching employee reactions to high performance work systems in the service sector: the role of organisational justice theory. In 16th ILERA (IIRA) World Congress.
Jiang, K. (2013). Bridging the gap between reality and perception: Managers' role in shaping employee perceptions of high performance work systems Doctoral dissertation. Rutgers The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick.
Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J. & Baer, J. C. (2012). “How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms”. Academy of management Journal, 55(6), 1264-1294.
 Keir, A. &Youssif, M. (2016). Staff Perceptions of how Human Resource Management Practices influence Organisational Performance: Mediating roles of Organisational Culture, Employees’ Commitment and Employee Retention in Bahrain Private Universities. Doctoral dissertation, Cardiff Metropolitan University.
Lin, T. C. & Huang, C. C. (2009). “Understanding social loafing in knowledge contribution from the perspectives of justice and trust”. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 6156-6163.
Liu, J. (2010). High Performance Work Systems and Firm Performance, The Moderator Role of Industry and Organizational Characteristics. Doctoral dissertation, Dublin City University.
Messersmith, J. G., Pankaj C., Patel, D., Lepak, P.  & Julian S. Gould-W., (2011). “Unlocking the black box: exploring the link between high-performance work systems and performance”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1105.
Meuer, J. (2016). Exploring the Complementarities Within HighPerformance Work Systems: A SetTheoretic Analysis of UK Firms, Human Resource Management. Published online in Wiley Online Library, 2-22.
Ogbonnaya, C. (2013). High performance work practices: investigating four perspectives on their employee-level impacts simultaneously, Doctoral dissertation, University of East Anglia.
Özşahin, M., Zehir, C., Acar, A. Z. & Sudak, M. K. (2013). “The effects of leadership and market orientation on organizational commitment”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 363-372.
Özçelik, G., Aybas, M. & Uyargil, C. (2016). “High Performance Work Systems and Organizational Values: Resource-based View Considerations”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 332-341.
Riaz, S. (2016). “High Performance Work Systems and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Study on Manufacturing and Service Organizations in Pakistan”. Public Organization Review, 16(4),421-442.
Tabouli, E. M., Habtoor, N. A. & Nashief, M. (2016). “The Impact of Human Resources Management on Employee Performance: Organizational Commitment Mediator Variable”. Asian Social Science, 12(9), 176.
Takeuchi, R., Chen, G. & Lepak, D. P. (2009). “Through the looking glass of a social system: crosslevel effects of high performance work systems on employees’ attitudes”. Personnel Psychology, 62(1), 1-29.
Takeuchi, R., Lepak, D.P., Wang, H. & Takeuchi, k. (2007). “An empirical examination of the mechanisms mediating between high-performance work system and the performance of Japanese organizations”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1069.
Wu, N., Hoque, K. & Bacon, N. (2011). »Exploring high performance work systems and performance: the importance of firm size in British. Academy of Management Conference, September, Birmingham.
Wu, N. L. (2011). High performance work practices in small and medium –size firms, Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham.
Xian, H., Atkinson, C. & Meng-Lewis, Y. (2017). “Guanxi and high performance work systems in China: evidence from a state-owned enterpris”. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-20.