Ali Asghar Pourrezzat
Abstract
Governance is not a field for trial and error; because it deals with the fate of the people; Therefore, it must be done with the utmost care and finesse and scientific calculations. What politician learn in practice and thus learn a lesson, policy makers experience in the policy laboratory! Also, ...
Read More
Governance is not a field for trial and error; because it deals with the fate of the people; Therefore, it must be done with the utmost care and finesse and scientific calculations. What politician learn in practice and thus learn a lesson, policy makers experience in the policy laboratory! Also, what developing countries experience in policy implementation and performance at exorbitant costs is what developed countries learn in the policy lab! The present study, considering the consequences of untested public policy implementation and comparing their various possible harms, considering the possibility of their initial testing in the laboratory environment and preventing various costs of implementing immature policies, emphasizes the need to the public policy test prior to the approval and implementation of public policies. This study deals exclusively with the executive branch and considers the bottlenecks of the policy test in that branch; The bottlenecks that cause many public policies to increase problems and problematic areas of society instead of solving problems and de-problematizing them from the public sphere.
Hadi Aref; seyed reza seyedjavadin; ali asghar pour ezzat; Ghanbar Mohammad Elyasi
Abstract
Sensemaking perspective is one of the strongest conceptual frameworks for explaining human and social phenomena in organizations. The aim of this study is to apply sensemaking perspective to better understand the performance appraisal system in organization. Employees’ perceptions and interpretations ...
Read More
Sensemaking perspective is one of the strongest conceptual frameworks for explaining human and social phenomena in organizations. The aim of this study is to apply sensemaking perspective to better understand the performance appraisal system in organization. Employees’ perceptions and interpretations and their actions play a pivotal role in performance appraisal effectiveness. Human beings are meaning making creatures and for understanding their actions, one has to enter into their worlds of meaning. The research method of this study is Charmaz’s constructivist Grounded Theory. The sampling method is theoretical sampling and the data gathering method is interviewing. Seventeen emlpyees from two companies with performance appraisal system were interviewed. In line with Charmaz’s constructivist approach to grounded theory, initial and focused coding formed the basis of our data analysis. Findings show that employees’ create four meanings out of performance appraisal: performance appraisal as the managers’ tool of oppression, performance appraisal as all encompassing behavioural record, performance appraisal as a torn paper, and performance appraisal as an unknown phenomenon.In the contexts of performance appraisal employees adopt four action strategies:exhibitive performance, authentic performance, indifference and senseseeking. Analyses demonstrate that the employees’ perceived agency in influencing their performance scores is the main determining factor in relating employees interpretations of performance appraisal to their actions.Given the importance of employees’ interpretations and actions in the effectiveness of HRM practices, this research can help organizations manage employees’ meaning and consequently improve the effectiveness of performance appraisal. Additionally findings of this research enhances the extant understanding of the HRM-performance relationship.
