Causation
hossein yakhkeshi; Ahmadali Khaefelahi
Abstract
The aim of the present study is to identify and analyze the factors reducing productivity in the Supreme Audit Court. This research was conducted in 2023using a mixed-methods approach (qualitative and quantitative). In the qualitative part, an exploratory method was used to identify the factors. Semi-structured ...
Read More
The aim of the present study is to identify and analyze the factors reducing productivity in the Supreme Audit Court. This research was conducted in 2023using a mixed-methods approach (qualitative and quantitative). In the qualitative part, an exploratory method was used to identify the factors. Semi-structured and in-depth interviews were conducted with19 experts, selected through purposive and snowball sampling. After analyzing the interviews and coding the responses, 34 indicators of factors reducing productivity were identified within 2 main dimensions and 9 components. The statistical population of the quantitative section of the study included all official and contractual employees of the supreme audit court and 31provinces, totaling 1,960 people. A 47-item questionnaire was designed, and using a mean comparison test, the impact of each factor on the reduction of productivity was identified. The results of hypothesis testing indicated that individual, organizational, the legislative, the executive components, and components of other supervisory institutions have a positive and significant impact on the reduction of productivity in the supreme audit court. However, the impact of the expediency council, the judicial branch components, media components, and general public components on the reduction of productivity in the supreme audit court was not confirmed. The results showed that although all components and their indicators were considered impactful on reducing productivity from the perspective of the research experts, from the perspective of the questionnaire respondents, the components of the expediency council, the judicial branch, the media, and the general public did not play a significant role in reducing productivity.
Somayeh Nemati; Ahmad Ali Khaef Elahi; Hasan DanaeeFard; Adel Azar
Volume 5, Issue 3 , July 2017, , Pages 65-80
Abstract
Movements in line with the evolution of public administration, the new public management movement "Public Value Management" was maturing as a new concept introduced in the public service and subsequently evaluate it. In this study, relying on indicators that the concept of "public value" in the public ...
Read More
Movements in line with the evolution of public administration, the new public management movement "Public Value Management" was maturing as a new concept introduced in the public service and subsequently evaluate it. In this study, relying on indicators that the concept of "public value" in the public service seeks to identify and rank the indicators are based on the concept of public value So we prioritized indicators to assess the performance of government agencies introduce human resources For this purpose, criteria and indicators are derived from literature and the panel of experts to assess face and content validity were After ensuring the validity and reliability of the questionnaire based on Likert scale 13 to assess construct validity (factor analysis) and reliability (Cronbach's alpha) The construct validity was confirmed was That three factors to establish the reliability (alpha more than 0.7) of a series of factors were excluded. Ten of the remaining pairwise comparison matrix provides a convenience sample of clients state-owned banks (National Bank and farming) were The fuzzy hierarchical analysis of dozens of people in need of care to measure responsive behavior in the first place And standards of appropriate behavior with colleagues of the importance of democratic behavior from the perspective of clients were in tenth place. This prioritization can act as a guide to planning and human resources are state-based public value in banking.
