Document Type : Exploratory

Authors

• Fatemeh Moradi ¹
• Syeyed Mehdi Alvani ²
• . . ³

¹ Ph.D Candidate, Department of Public Administration, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.

² Prof, Department of Public Administration, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.

³ Faculty of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran

Abstract

The proactivity of organizations is the necessity of today’s changing world. So the aim of this research was to determine the proper proactivity rate in Iranian governmental organizations. The research is quantitative in terms of method, applied in terms of purpose and exploratory survey in terms of research type. The statistical population was Fars Province Economic and Financial Affairs Department, Fars Province Governorate, Fars Province Agricultural Jihad, and Fars Province Islamic Culture, and Guidance Department located in Shiraz. The samples were selected through classification sampling method. The insruments for collecting data was a questionnaire, and Fuzzy Control method  was used to analyze collected data . Based on findings, the proper situation for an organization to be proactive was provided through combining four dimensions of human relations, open system, internal process and rational goals. The results showed that Jihad Organization of Fars province was in the first rank in terms of proactivity in 1397 and the existing status of proactivity in terms of human relations and open system was more than needed, and in terms of rational goals and internal process was equal to the required level. In the Organization of Economic Affairs, Finance and Governance of Fars Province, the status of the proactivity in terms of human relations and the open system was less than needed and the dimensions of rational goals and internal process was less than rquired rate. In the Islamic Culture and Guidance Organization of Fars province in terms of human relations, open system, rational goals and internal process, the status of proactivity was less than rquired.

Keywords

• Proactivity
• Proactive Governmental Organization
• Characteristics of Proactive Governmental Organizations

20.1001.1.2322522.1398.7.0.3.9

Main Subjects

• Modeling