Document Type : Exploratory

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Management, Lorestan University, Khoram Abad, Iran.

2 Professor, Department of Management, Lorestan University, Khoram Abad, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Lorestan University, Khoram Abad, Iran.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to design and explain the performance evaluation model of the governors of the Islamic Republic of Iran. This study is applied in terms of purpose and is descriptive in terms of method. The qualitative population in the present study consisted of all university professors in the field of public administration and strategic management, the governors of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and senior managers of the Ministry of Interior. The number of participants in this study was 18. The statistical population of the study consisted of a small group of experts such as the governors of the Islamic Republic of Iran, deputies, and senior managers. The research sample was 48 people selected from the statistical population by using the convenience non-probability sampling method. The results of the qualitative part of the study were the identification of 12 main categories including geographical knowledge, cultural awareness, social maturity, political perception, economic growth, welfare development, stakeholder satisfaction, security level, social capital, political participation, interactions, and productivity. The model classified performance evaluation dimensions into 5 levels, in which geographical knowledge was found as the most effective dimention, and stakeholder satisfaction, political participation, and productivity as the most effective dimensions.

Keywords

Asgharizadeh, E, Ehsani, R., & Valipour, F. (2011). Evaluating the performance of managers using 360-degree method and Vickor decision-making technique (Case study of Jihad Agricultural Engineering Research Institute). Industrial Management Studies, 9(23), 21-48. (In Persian)
Athar, S., & Wang, Z. (2019). A comprehensive performance evaluation of image quality assessment algorithms. Ieee Access7, 140030-140070.
Bakeman, R. (2022). KappaAcc: A program for assessing the adequacy of kappa. Behavior Research Methods, 1-6.
Bamakan, S. M. H., Motavali, A., & Bondarti, A. B. (2020). A survey of blockchain consensus algorithms performance evaluation criteria. Expert Systems with Applications154, 113385.
Boom, S., Weijschede, J., Melissen, F., Koens, K., & Mayer, I. (2021). Identifying stakeholder perspectives and worldviews on sustainable urban tourism development using a Q-sort methodology. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(4), 520-535.
Danaeifard, H. (2008). Theorizing, principles and methodologies. Tehran: Samat. (In Persian)
Danaeifard, H., & Kazemi, S H. (2008). Social research methods, quantitative and qualitative approaches. Tehran: Mehraban Nashr. (In Persian)
Flach, P. (2019). Performance evaluation in machine learning: the good, the bad, the ugly, and the way forward. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 33, No. 01, pp. 9808-9814).
Ghorbani, I., & Kiani, J. (2019). Presenting a model for evaluating the performance of commanders and managers based on the statement of the second step of the revolution (Case study: Disciplinary Command Headquarters of West Azerbaijan Province). Scientific Journal of Law Enforcement Research, Amin University of Law Enforcement Sciences, 21(2), 247-280. (In Persian)
Habibi, A., Izadiar, S., & Sarafrazi, A. (2014). Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Rasht: Katibeh Gil Publications. (In Persian)
Habibi, A; Izadiar, S; Sarafrazi, A. (2015), Teaching Fuzzy Delphi Technique for Predicting and Screening Indicators, Journal of Management and Economics, 12(3), 79- 92. (In Persian)
JAFARI, T., shafiabadi, A., farahbakhsh, K., abbaspour, A., younesi, J. (2020). Designing performance evaluation indicators for managers of Iran State Inspectorate Organization with job counseling approach. Career and Organizational Counseling, 12(43), 9-32.
Karimi, R, Noh Ebrahim, A, Hassanpour, A, Musapour, N. (2020). Designing a model for evaluating the performance of faculty members of Farhangian University. Educational Studies, 9(3), 253-284. (In Persian)
Marsidin, S. (2020). The Practicality of Principal’s Performance Appraisal Model. In 2nd International Conference Innovation in Education (ICoIE 2020) (pp. 305-309). Atlantis Press.
Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. A companion to qualitative research, 1(2), 159-176.
Mehrabi, A H; Khanifar ، H; Amiri, Ali Naqi; Zarei Matin, H; Jandaghi, Gholamreza (2012). Introducing the methodology of data-based theory for Islamic research (providing a sample). Organizational culture management. 9(23), 30-5. (In Persian)
Mirzaei, KH. (2009). Research and writing correspondence. Tehran: Sociologists Publications. (In Persian)
Neustroev, S., Gordashnikova, O., & Zibrov, V. (2020). Designing a Regional Performance Appraisal Model for Administrators of Educational Institutions. Quality-Access to Success, 21(179), 10-14.
Niroomand, H., & Rzayat, G. H. (2020). Employee performance appraisal pattern of military organizations. Strategic Defense Studies, 18(82), 289-312.
Sanchez-Iborra, R., Sanchez-Gomez, J., Ballesta-Viñas, J., Cano, M. D., & Skarmeta, A. F. (2018). Performance evaluation of LoRa considering scenario conditions. Sensors, 18(3), 772.
Selvarajan, T. T., Singh, B., & Solansky, S. (2018). Performance appraisal fairness, leader member exchange and motivation to improve performance: A study of US and Mexican employees. Journal of Business Research85, 142-154.
Sepahvand, F., Mohammadipour, F., Parvizy, S., Zagheri Tafreshi, M., Skerrett, V., & Atashzadeh‐Shoorideh, F. (2020). Improving nurses’ organizational commitment by participating in their performance appraisal process. Journal of nursing management28(3), 595-605.
Setiawati, T., & Ariani, I. D. (2020). Influence of performance appraisal fairness and job satisfaction through commitment on job performance. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research9(3), 133-151.
Shaikh, F. U. A., Luhar, S., Arel, H. Ş., & Luhar, I. (2020). Performance evaluation of Ultrahigh performance fibre reinforced concrete–A review. Construction and Building Materials232, 117152.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Principles of Qualitative Research Methodology: Basic Theory, Procedures and Methods. Translated by Buick Mohammadi. Tehran. Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. second edition. (In Persian)
Tetiana, H., Karpenko, L. M., Olesia, F. V., Yu, S. I., & Svetlana, D. (2018). Innovative methods of performance evaluation of energy efficiency projects. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 1-11.