Public Organizations Management

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Theorizing the Emergence Pattern of Masochistic Behavior of Government Managers; A Metaphor for a Personality Type

Document Type : Exploratory

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Business Administration, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.

2 Ph.D Student, Department of Public Administration, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran

3 Ph.D Student, Department of Public Administration, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran.

Abstract

In the last decade, in the political system of the Islamic Republic of Iran, we have witnessed the behavior of government administrators who, due to the degradation of their power and position, have caused serious damage to their records and their past achievements, as well as the system that is the result of their own achievements. To theorize this behavioral model of government managers, a metaphor was taken from the disease of masochism. Masochistic personality is a personality type in which people tend to exhibit self-destructive behaviors. The purpose of the research was to theorize the emergence pattern of masochistic behavior of public administrators by taking the metaphor of a mental illness. The research method was metaphorical theorizing, and the research data were collected and analyzed using the grounded theory method and Glasser (appearing) productivity method. The basis of the study was the research of the political system of the Islamic Republic. As a result, interviews were conducted with 15 experts in public administration and political science (using a targeted method) to collect data. The method of data analysis was based on three-stage open, central and selective coding. The results obtained from the data analysis were divided into four main components of masochistic personality of public administrators, masochistic ideology of public administrators, masochistic policies and masochistic atmosphere, and then these four components were divided into two general categories of masochistic values and system. Cultivating masochism was categorized as the main reasons for masochistic behavior of public administrators. Finally, the consequences of managers' masochistic behavior were identified and strategies were suggested for them. In the general summary of this research, according to the opinion of experts, the policies of the system in the selection of public administrators are the main reason for the occurrence of masochistic behavior of public administrators, and factors such as the personality of public administrators, the masochistic ideology of administrators, and the atmosphere of masochism can complement the occurrence of masochistic behavior of administrators.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References
Abas, F.N., & Raji, F. (2018). Factors contributing to inefflcient management and maintenance of wagf properties: A literature review. Environmental Science Business Engineering, 10(11), 233-242. DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.11113/umran2018.5n3.233
Alini, A. (2022). A study of the roots and structural processes of economic and financial corruption in Iran (The period of the Islamic Republic). Social Development and Welfare Planning, 13(51), 254-219. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22054/qjsd.2022.65156.2281
Aljundi, S., Shuhaiber, A., & Alemara, S. (2021). The effect of culture and organisatinal culture onadministrative corruption. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 18(4), 436-451. DOI: 10.1504/IJEBR.2019.10024410
Ndidi, A. M., Amah, E., & Okocha, B. F. (2022). Micromanaging behaviour and employee productivity in SMEs in rivers state. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 6(4), 745-755. DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2022.6434
Bahoo, S., Alon, I., & Floreani, J. (2021). Corruption in economics: a bibliometric analysis and research agenda. Applied Economics Letters, 28(7), 565-578. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1764476
Balasundaram, I. (2020). Toxic leadershipover the yearsa review. Discover the Worlds Research, 1(1), 106-110.
Benson, A., Li, D., & Shue, K. (2019). Promotions and the peter principle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(4), 2085-21340. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3047193
Bozorgnia, A., & Khalili, K. (2023). Why managers are ineffective in government organizations, 9th International Conference on Management and Accounting Sciences. (In Persian)
Caiden, G. E. (2019). Dealing with Administrative Corruption. In T. Cooper (Ed.), Handbook of Administrative Ethics (pp. 429-455). Routledge.
Coray, A., Dzhumasher, R., & Schnider, F. (2017). How does corruption affect public debt ? An empivical and lysis. Word Development, 90(2), 115-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.08.020
Danaifard, H., & Elwani, S. M. (2008). Metaphorical Reasoning Strategy in Building Theory: A New Theory of Administrative System. Human Sciences Modares, 3(11), 108-135. (In Persian)
Danaifred, H. (2006). A Study About Philosophical Foundations of Complexity Theory: Is Complexity Science a Postmodern Theory? Management Research in Iran, 10(20), 171-210. (In Persian)
Ghinea, V., Cantaraglu, R., & Chinea, M. (2019). The peter princciple and the limits of our currentunderstanding of organizational incompetene. Quality Access to Success, 20(172), 74-77.
Gholami, A. (2019). The Role of Behavioral Variables in the Mismanagement and Inefficiency of Government Managers. Journal of Economic Security, 8(11), 78-71. (In Persian)
Gong, T., Sun, P., & Jung Kang, M. (2022). Customer oriented constru ctive deviance as a reaction to organizational injustice toward customers. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 63(1), 119-135 . https://doi.org/10.1177/19389655211012327
Hazrati, M. (2018). Induced inadequacy in government offices and organizations. Journal of Research in Management and Humanities, 5(7), 439-450.
Hosny, H., & Okasha, A. (2021). Agent Based Models of Administrative Corruption: an Oveview. International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 42(2), 350-358. DOI:10.1080/02286203.2021.1907652
Hung Kee, D., & Shiong Chung, K. (2021). Perceived organizational injustice, job satisfaction, organizational commitment and turnoverinteion: a study of mncs in malaysia. Internaltion Journal of Business and Society, 22(2), 1047-1065. DOI: 10.33736/ijbs.3781.2021
Jeong, Y., & Kim, M. (2021). Effects of perceived organizational support and perceived organizational politics on organizational performance: Mediating role of differential treatment. Asia Pacific Management Review, 27(3), 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.08.002
Jin, K., Lee, J., & Hong, S. M. (2021). The Dark Side of Managing for the longrun: Examining when family Firms Create Value. Sustainability, 13(7), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073776
Kakeh Baraei, E., Mirzaei, M., & Bidabadi, R. (2019). Administrative Cirruption and the Challenges of Entreprenurshipn Development. Jiurnal if Management and Studies, 7(02), 20-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24200/jmas.vol7iss02pp20-27
Kashian, B., & Bigi, M. (2019). Kashian, B., Bigi, M. (2019). Effective Management Model and Solving Employees’ Poor Performance Problem. Journal of Police Organizational Development, 16(2), 73-92 (In Persian)
Lee, Y. (2022). Employees Negative Megaphoning in Response to Organizational Injustice: The Mediating Role of Employee Organizati on Relationship and Negative Affect. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(1), 89-103. DOI:10.1007/s10551-021-04804-5
Meza, D. (2021). Constructions of noncompliance: narratives and contexts in the case of administvtire corruption. Internaltional Public Management Journal, 24(17), 623-645. DOI:10.1080/10967494.2020.1793041
Mohammadifar, Y., & Soleimani, M. (2018). Factors Influencing Human Capital Management Inefficiency and Solutions to it (Case Study: Kermanshah Provincial Government Agencies). Public Management Perspective, 3(10), 150-178. (In Persian) DOI: 10.48308/jpap.2019.96572
Rahmanian, M., Ghanbari, A., Yezidi-Rad, R. (2021). Corruption and legal solutions to deal with it. scientific journal of modern jurisprudence and law, 3(10), 116-131. (In Persian)  DOI: 10.22034/jml.2022.253321
Razmjo, M., Begzadeh, J., Farhadenjad, H. A., Dadash Karim, Y. (2023). Designing the model of dwarfism in Iran's government organizations. State Management Vision Quarterly, 11(4), 98-77. (In Persian) DOI: 10.48308/jpap.2023.103107
Razmjo, M., Beikzadeh, J., Farhadenjad, J.A., Dadash Karim, Y. (2022). Explanation of the strategic model of dwarf breeding management in Iran's Government Organizations. Strategic Management Researches, 28(84), 40-72. (In Persian)
Resce, G,. & Pineiro, C. (2023). Political Favouritism and Ine Fficient Management: Policy Markers Birthtown Bias in Eu Qulity Certifications. Journal of Policymodeling, 16(28), 104-118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2024.03.004
Riesepour, A. (2023). The inefficiency of managers and employees in the public sector and the ways out of inefficiency, the 11th International Conference on Humanities, Economics, Management and Accounting. (In Persian)
Sarnecki, A., Diehl, R., & Richter, A. (2023). Organizational injustice and employee affective health: The moderating effect of labor market conditions. Eurpoean Management Journal, 78(90), 90- 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2023.08.005
Seifi Shujaei, H. (2018). Identifying and Prioritizing the Factors Affecting Managers' Inefficiency. the fifth International Conference of Management and Accounting Sciences.
Shahab, M.M., & Ridh, A. (2023). Administrative corruption and mechanisms for measuring the level of corruption in countries. Tikrit university Journal for Rightsyear, 7(4), 504-531. https://tujr.tu.edu.iq/index.php/home/article/view/77
Shahbazi, R., Hadian, A., & Afzal, A. (2021). Identification and prioritization of the factors affecting corruption using AHP. Economic Strategy, 11(40), 145-175. (In Persian) DOI: 10.22034/es.2022.155464
Sherry, G. (2021). Waste and infficiency: management and policy. The Journal of Health Administration, 38(3), 655-664.
Soltani, M. H., Majidi, M., & Sadh., A. (2022). Prioritizing effective factors and combating administrative corruption in Iran's government organizations with a policy-making approach. Iranian Sociology Scientific Monthly, (11) 5, 6753-6744. (In Persian) DOI: 10.30510/psi.2022.359732.3902
Syed, F., Naseer, S., & Bouckenoo, D. (2021). Unfairness in stressful job environments: The contingent effect of perceived organizational injustice on the relationships between job sttess and employee behaviors. The Journal of General Psychology, 148(2), 168-191. DOI: 10.1080/00221309.2020.1747968
Uroos, A., Shabbir, M., & Zahid, M. (2022). Economic analysis of corruption: evidence from pakistan. Transnational corporations review, 14(1), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/19186444.2021.1917331
Suwaryo, U., Agustino, L., & Sulaeman, A. (2021). REcruitment of BUreaucratic officials for the Position of Head of the Community and Village Empowerment Agency, 2018, IN THE REGIONAL Government of West Java Province. Post-Gubernatorial Election. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 18(4), 2230-2249.
Yasini, A., Shiri, A., & Moradikia, F. (2017). A comparative study of the role of negative aspects of organizational behavior in the emergence of ineffective job behaviors of employees. Management Studies Scientific Research Quarterly, (28) 90, 65-88. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22054/jmsd.2019.9396
Yilmaz, A., & Akif, A. (2019). Determinants if economic corruption: A Cross Counyry Analysis. Intrnational Journal of Business and Social, 2(13), 161-169. DOI:10.32368/FJES.20141004
Public Organizations Management
Volume 12, Vol 3 , Series 48 - Serial Number 48
October 2024
Pages 19-36
Files
History
  • Receive Date: 06 August 2024
  • Revise Date: 20 October 2024
  • Accept Date: 21 October 2024
Share
How to cite
Statistics