با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن مدیریت دولتی ایران و انجمن مدیریت رفتار سازمانی

نوع مقاله : اکتشافی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران

چکیده

این پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی است، روش پژوهش از نوع کیفی و مبتنی بر تحلیل محتوا است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش، تمامی مقالات مجله مدیریت سازمان‌های دولتی در بازده زمانی 1391 تا 1399 انجام گرفته است. در این پژوهش همه عناصر جامعه به صورت سرشماری بررسی شده‌اند. تعداد 262 مقاله از نظر 9 شاخص مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. به‌منظور تأیید روایی، هریک از شاخص‌های موردنظر با دیگر مقالات مطابقت داده شد و در هر مورد اختلاف مورد بررسی و بازبینی مجدد قرار گرفت، جهت بررسی پایایی نیز، تعداد 13 مقاله در اختیار خبرگان دانشگاهی قرار داده شد و نتایج و طبقه‌بندی‌های آنان با تحلیل‌های صورت گرفته مورد مقایسه قرار گرفت. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که بیشترین مقالات، توسط استادان و دانشجویان با مدرک مدیریت دولتی چاپ شده است. موضوع محوری بیشتر مقالات، رفتار سازمانی، مدیریت تشکیلات، سیستم‌ها و روش‌ها در بخش دولتی و مدیریت منابع انسانی بوده است. همچنین براساس نتایج پژوهش، بیشتر پژوهش‌ها به صورت کاربردی و دارای رویکرد کیفی بوده‌اند. روش تحلیل بیشتر مقالات مورد بررسی، ترکیبی از روش‌های کمی و کیفی بوده و شیوه گردآوری داده‌ها بیشتر از طریق پرسشنامه بوده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Content Analysis of the Research of the Journal Of Public Organizations Management

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Torabi 1
  • Mohammadreza Fathi 2

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Management, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Farabi University of Tehran, Qom, Iran.

چکیده [English]

This article reviews the research of the Journal of Public Organizations Management from a methodological perspective. In terms of purpose, this research is applied and in terms of method, it is qualitative and based on content analysis. The statistical population of this research is all articles in the Journal of public organizations management that were conducted and published from 2012 to 2020. Sampling was done on the basis of the census method. In this study, 262 articles were reviewed based on 9 indicators. In order to confirm the validity, each of the indicators was matched with the other articles and in each case, the differences were reviewed and re-examined. To evaluate the reliability, 13 articles were given to academic experts and their results and classifications were compared with the analyzes performed. The results showed that most of the articles were published by professors and students with a degree in public management. The central themes of most articles have been organizational behavior, management of public organizations, systems and methods, and human resource management in the public sector. Also, based on the research results, most studies have been applied with a qualitative approach. The method analysis of most of the articles was a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods and the majority of data collection was done through questionnaires.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Content Analysis
  • Public Management
  • Journal of public Organizations Management
Abdolhamid, M., Esmaeiligivi, M., & Bagherzadeh, M., (2020). Providing strategies for improving the quality of scientific products in the field of public administration in Iran based on the content analysis of Public Management Perspectives. Cheshmandaz Modiriat Dolati, 11(2), 97-126. (In Persian)
Baldwin, T., Bommer, W., & Rubin, R. (2008). Developing management skills: What great managers know and do. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Bingham, R. D., & Bowen, W. M. (1994). Mainstream public administration over time: a topical content analysis of Public Administration Review. Public Administration Review, 54(2), 204-208.
Danaeifard, H. (2008). Challenges of Public Management in Iran, Tehran: Samat Publications. (In Persian)
Danaeifard, H., & Alvani, M. (2006). Transformation strategy in the public sector of Iran. Daneshvar Behavior Quarterly, 13(17), 97-120. (In Persian)
Danaeifard, H., Alvani, M., & Adel Azar (2019). Qualitative research methodology in management: a comprehensive approach, Tehran: Saffar Publications. (In Persian)
Denhardt, R. B. (1984). Theories of Public Administration. Pacific Grove, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
Ebrahimi, S., & Hayati, Z. (2008). Quantity and quality of science production in Iranian universities. Quarterly Journal of New Educational Thoughts, 4(3), 105-126. (In Persian)
Farazmand, A. (1996). Development and comparative public administration: Past, present, and future. Public Administration Quarterly, 343-364.
Ferdosi, S., Molaei, F., Hajipour, B., & Babaei, M., (2019). Meta-methodology of Marketing Research in Iran: investigating Methods. Pazhoheshhaye Modiriat dar Iran, 23(2), 183-199. (In Persian)
Ghaedi, MR., & Golshani, A. (2016). Content analysis method, from quantitative to qualitative. Psychological Methods and Models,7(23), 57-82. (In Persian)
Ghochani, M. (2017). Network Governance Model with Open Innovation Process Development Approach, Case Study: Cyberspace Security Research Institutions, Ph.D Thesis, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran. (In Persian)
Gill, J., & Meier, K. J. (2000). Public administration research and practice: A methodological manifesto. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), 157-199.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A. L., & Tummers, L. (2017). Behavioral public administration: Combining insights from public administration and psychology. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 45-56.
Gulrajani, N., & Moloney, K. (2012). Globalizing public administration: today's research and tomorrow's agenda. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 78-86.
Heidari, Gh. (2011). Epistemology of scientometrics, Shiraz: Publication of Islamic World Citation Database. (In Persian)
Imani, H., Abdollahzadeh, A., & pourezzat, A., (2018). Content analysis of researches in the Journal of Public Management of University of Tehran. Faslname Modiriat Dolati, 10(3), 387-414. (In Persian)
Johnston, J. (2015). Public administration: Organizational aspects. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, 19, 521-525.
Kettl, D. F. (1995). Building lasting reforms: Enduring questions, missing answers. Inside the reinvention machine: Appraising governmental reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Lowe, K. and Gardner, W. (2001). Ten years of the leadership quarterly: Contributions and challenges for the future. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4):459-514.
Marume, S. B. M. (2016). Meaning of Public Administration. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 4(6), 15-20
McCurdy, H. E., & Cleary, R. E. (1984). Why can't we resolve the research issue in public administration? Public Administration Review, 44(1), 49-55.
Onder, M., & Brower, R. S. (2013). Public Administration Theory, Research, and Teaching: How Does Turkish Public Administration Differ? Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(1), 117-139.
Perry, J. L., & Kraemer, K. L. (1986). Research Methodology in the "Public Administration Review",1975-1984, public administration review, 46(3), 215-226.
Raadschelders, J. C., & Lee, K. H. (2011). Trends in the study of public administration. Empirical and qualitative observations from Public Administration Review, 2000–2009. Public Administration Review, 71(1), 19-33.
Raadschelders, Jos & Douglas, James. (2003). The Doctoral Graduate in Public Administration: Apprentice or Master?. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 9, 229-243.
Raadschelders, Jos C. N. (1999). A Coherent Framework for The Study of Public Administration. Journal of public Administration Research and Theory. 9,20, 281-303.
Rahnavard, F., & Mohebbi, M. (2015). The effects of globalization on public administration in Iran. Journal of Public Administration, 8(3), 415-436. (In Persian)
Sadeghi, A., Moshabakiesfahani, A., Kordnaeij, A., & Khodadadhassani, H., (2015). Meta-methodology of Islamic Management Research in Iran (Case Study: Scientific-Articles 2001-2005). Faslname Modiriat Eslami, 23(4), 101-131. (In Persian)
Stremersch, S., Verniers, I., & Verhoef, P. C. (2007). The quest for citations: Drivers of article impact. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 171-193.
Sugimoto, C.R. & Robbin, A. (2017). Examining the Evolution of the Field of Public Administration through a Bibliometric Analysis of Public Administration Review. Public Administration Review, 77, 496-509.
Tayebbiabolhassani, A., Daneshvar, M., & Khasheeivarnamkhasti, V., (2019). Meta-methodology of academic research in the field of strategy. Motaleate Modiriat Rahbordi, 40(1), 71-105. (In Persian)
Van de Walle, S., & Van Delft, R. (2015). Publishing in public administration: Issues with defining, comparing, and ranking the output of universities. International Public Management Journal, 18(1), 87-107.
Waldo, Dwight. (1965). The Study of Public Administration, New York: Random House.