با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن مدیریت دولتی ایران و انجمن مدیریت رفتار سازمانی

نوع مقاله : توصیفی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، مدیریت بازرگانی، پردیس بین المللی ارس، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

3 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

نیروی کار متخصص پایه و اساس بسیاری از موفقیت‌ها چه در سطح کلان و چه در سطح خرد می‌باشد. با توجه به تغییر ساختار جمعیت، تعویق بازنشستگی کارکنان یکی از موضوع های بسیار مهم می‌باشد ، روش تحقیق در این پژوهش، فلسفه پژوهش تفسیری یا برساخت گرایی می‌باشد. رویکرد پژوهش استقرایی -قیاسی، راهبرد پژوهش نظریه داده بنیاد نسخه گلدکل و کرونهلم می‌باشد. روش گردآوری اطلاعات، مصاحبه‌های نیمه ساختاریافته بوده است. بدین منظور ا جامعه پژوهشی که شامل کارکنان وزارت نیرو بوده که بازنشستگی خود را به تعویق انداخنه اند، نمونه گیری نظری صورت گرفت و از این طریق، با 30 نفر مصاحبه‌هایی انجام شد. و  نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که شرایط شغلی مقوله محوری در مدل تعویق بازنشستگی کارکنان در وزارت نیرو، می‌باشد و عواملی مانند بسترهای های محیطی، سازمانی، فردی و شرایط علی سازمانی، فردی و دولتی و موانع شامل دخالت مستقیم دولت و قانون‌گریزی در آن تأثیرگذار می‌باشد که در نهایت منجر به پیامدهای مثبت و منفی متعددی می‌گردد. با عنایت به مراتب فوق نتیجه گیری می گردد که فشار اقتصادی و مسئله پیری جمعیت و بالا رفتن نسبت افراد سالمند به افراد جوان موجب کاهش نیروی کار می‌گردد که مسائل و مشکلات بسیار زیادی را برای دولتها و سازمان‌های مختلف ازجمله وزارت نیرو و همچنین صندوق‌های بازنشستگی ایجاد می نماید. راه کاری که در این زمینه اتخاذ می‌شود مسئله تعویق بازنشستگی و نگهداشت بیشتر نیروی کار می‌باشد که با توجه به نتایجی که به همراه دارد می‌تواند در عرصه های اقتصادی، اجتماعی، سازمانی، فردی تأثیرگذار باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

the government and the circumvention of the law, which ultimately leads to a multitude of positive and negative consequences.

نویسندگان [English]

  • arash خیرابی 1
  • Abbas Nargesiyan 2
  • Ali Pirannejad 3

1 . Ph.D. Candidate, Department Business Management, Ares International Campus, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.

2 . Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iiran.

چکیده [English]

The expert workforce is essential for the achievement of successes on both macro and micro levels. Consequently, due to the changes in the demographics of population and society, the postponement of the retirement age of employees is a significant issue.This research has adopted an interpretive or constructivist research philosophy and the multi-grounded theory research strategy of Goldkuhl & Cronholm. Semi-structured interviews were utilized as the data collection method and theoretical sampling was conducted from the research community which included employees of the Ministry of Energy who have postponed their retirement. Thirty participants were interviewed. It’s also noteworthy that the research is practical in terms of its purpose.The findings of this research demonstrate that the model of postponing the retirement age of employees in the Ministry of Energy is primarily based on job conditions, as well as factors such as environmental, organizational, and individual contexts and organizational, individual, and governmental causal conditions. Some of the obstacles in this model include the direct intervention of the government and the circumvention of the law, which ultimately leads to a multitude of positive and negative consequences. The economic pressures, the issue of population aging, and the increased ratio of elderly people to young people will reduce the labor force and create difficulties for governments and various organizations, including the Ministry of Energy and pension funds. Hence, the adoption of the issue of postponing retirement age and keeping more of the labor force is a possible solution due to the positive outcomes it may potentially yield in the economic, social, organizational, and individual fields and aspects.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • The Expert Workforce
  • Postponing the Retirement Age
  • Job Conditions
  • Ministry of Energy
  • Model of Postponing the Retirement of Employees
Angeloni, S., & Borgonovi, E. (2016). An ageing world and the challenges for a model of sustainable social change. Journal of Management Development35(4), 464-485.‏
Azar, A., &  Safari, M. (2016). Identifying factors affecting the sustainability of private pension plans using the combined approach of soft systems methodology and fuzzy cognitive mapping. Iranian journal of management sciences (IAMS), 11(43), 21-58. (In Persian)
Bratun, U., & Zurc, J. (2022). The motives of people who delay retirement: An occupational perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy29(6), 482-494.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2020.1832573
Bravo, J. M., Ayuso, M., Holzmann, R., & Palmer, E. (2021). Intergenerational Actuarial Fairness When Longevity Increases: Amending the Retirement Age. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3961911
Buheji, M. (2021). Fore sighting the Transformation Requirements towards Aging Economy. International Journal of Management (IJM), 12(9), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM.12.9.2021.011
Dehghani, B.,  Dashtban FArouji, M.,   Khoshnoodi, A.,  & Alinejad Mofrad, M. (2020). The Effects of Population Aging on the Future of Iran's Pension System. Iranian Population Studies Journal, 6(1), 261-288. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22034/jips.2020.236663.1057
Deli, J., Yuan, B., & Lan, J. (2021). The influence of late retirement on health outcomes among older adults in the policy context of delayed retirement initia. Archives of Public Health, 79(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00582-8
Ebrahimi, M., & Nasiri, M. (2021). Investigating the effect of retirement age on the labor force participation rate in oecd countries. Applied Economic Quarterly, 11(37), 55-73. (In Persian)
Edge, C. E., Cooper, A. M., & Coffey, M. (2017). Barriers and facilitators to extended working lives in Europe: A gender focus. Public Health Reviews, 38(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40985-017-0053-8/TABLES/3
Golab, S., & Bazzazan F. (2020). The Effects of Parametric Reforms on Retirees’ Welfare and Financial Sustainability of the Social Security Organization Pension System. Refahj,  20(76), 237-269. (In Persian)
Grundy, E. M., & Murphy, M. (2017). Population ageing in Europe. Oxford Textbook of Geriatric Medicine, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780198701590.003.0002
Henkens, K., Van Dalen, H. P., Ekerdt, D. J., Hershey, D. A., Hyde, M., Radl, J., Van Solinge, H., Wang, M., & Zacher, H. (2018). What We Need to Know About Retirement: Pressing Issues for the Coming Decade. The Gerontologist, 58(5), 805–812. https://doi.org/10.1093/GERONT/GNX095
Kadefors, R., Wikström, E., & Arman, R. (2020). The capability of organizations to manage delayed retirement. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 7(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-06-2019-0047
Kashin, K., King, G., & Soneji, S. (2015). Systematic bias and nontransparency in US Social Security Administration forecasts. Journal of Economic Perspectives29(2), 239-258.‏
Kauppi, M., Prakash, K. C., Virtanen, M., Pentti, J., Aalto, V., Oksanen, T., ... & Stenholm, S. (2021). Social relationships as predictors of extended employment beyond the pensionable age: a cohort study. European Journal of Ageing, 1-11.‏
Li, J., Yuan, B., & Lan, J. (2021). The influence of late retirement on health outcomes among older adults in the policy context of delayed retirement initiative: an empirical attempt of clarifying identification bias. Archives of Public Health79(1), 59.‏
Lu, L. (2012). Attitudes towards aging and older people's intentions to continue working: a Taiwanese study. Career Development International17(1), 83-98.‏
Madrasi Alam, Z. (2019). A look at the methods of reforming the pension system and the general framework of its reform in the country. Economic, 12, 123-130. (In Persian)
Mensah, R. (2022). Perceived Consequences of Unplanned Retirement of Staff of Educational Institutions: The Case of Takoradi Technical University, Ghana. Ghana (July 25, 2022).‏
Moatamedy, A.,   Aazami, Y., Masood Rostami, M., Jalalvand, M. (2020). The Quality of life in the Retirement: The Role of Personality Traits, Coping Strategies and Religious Attitudes. Aging Psychology, 6(3), 217-205. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22126/JAP.2020.3545.1296
Mohammad-Ghaffari, H., & Agheli, L. (2011). Retirement and Participation of Elderly Women in Labor Market Case Study of Tehran, women s studies (Sociological & Psychological), 9(1), 33. (In Persian)
Nili, M.,  Seyed Khosroshahi, A., &  Ebrahimi, S.B.  (2013). Social Security Payments and Decision about Timing of Retirement: An Economic Analysis. Journal of Economic Research, 12(47), 217-244. (In Persian)
O’Sullivan, J. (2014). Ageing paranoia, its fictional basis and all too real costs. Sustainable Futures, 47-60.‏
 Reynolds, F., Farrow, A., & Blank, A. (2012). Otherwise it would be nothing but cruises”: exploring the subjective benefits of working beyond 65. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 7(1), 79–106.
Rezaei, E. (2016). The Effect of Demographic Changes on Government Social Expenditure and Life Cycle Expenditure in Iran Economy. Qjfep, 3(11), 62-84. (In Persian)
Ribes, E. A. (2022). Financial planning and optimal retirement timing for physically intensive occupations. SN Business & Economics2(8), 93.‏
Rowthorn, B. (2015). The Costs and Benefits of Large-scale Immigration: Exploring the economic and demographic consequences for the UK. Civitas.‏
Stevens, M. J., Barker, M., Dennison, E., Harris, E. C., Linaker, C., Weller, S., & Walker-Bone, K. (2022). Recent UK retirees’ views about the work-related factors which influenced their decision to retire: a qualitative study within the Health and Employment After Fifty (HEAF) cohort. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1-10.‏
Yuan, B., Li, J., & Liang, W. (2022). The interaction of delayed retirement initiative and the multilevel social health insurance system on physical health of older people in China. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 37(1), 452-464.‏. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3352