تحلیل محتوایی ابزارهای انسجام در سخنرانی‌های دولت تدبیر و امید در حوزۀ مدیریت کلان سازمان‌های دولتی، دوره اول و دوم ریاست جمهوری

حضرتی, یوسف

doi:10.30473/ipom.2023.67941.4830

نوع مقاله : توصیفی

نویسنده

یوسف حضرتی

استادیار، گروه زبان‌شناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

https://doi.org/10.30473/ipom.2023.67941.4830

چکیده

در پژوهش حاضر، محتوای سخنرانیهای دولت تدبیر و امید در حوزۀ مدیریت کلان سازمانهای دولتی، دوره اول و دوم ریاست جمهوری از منظر کاربرد ابزارهای انسجام و در چارچوب نقشگرایی هلیدی و حسن (1976) مورد واکاوی قرار گرفتند. پژوهش به شیوۀ تحلیل محتوا و به صورت توصیفی و تحلیلی انجام گرفت و محتوای آن چهار سخنرانی در حوزۀ مدیریت کلان سازمانهای دولتی بود که به شیوۀ تصادفی انتخاب شدند. ابزارهای انسجام در چهار سخنرانی استخراج گردید و بسامدگیری شدند. درصد وقوع هریک از ابزارها نیز به دست آمد. پس از بررسی دادهها مشخص شد، سخنرانی اول با 474 مورد، سخنرانی دوم با 444 مورد، سخنرانی چهارم با 421 مورد و سخنرانی سوم با 411 مورد، در به‌کارگیری ابزارهای انسجام به ترتیب در رتبههای اول تا چهارم قرار دارند. در سخنرانی اول، ارجاع بیشترین و معرفگی و زمان، کمترین ابزار انسجام بودند. در سخنرانی دوم، تکرار و معرفگی به ترتیب بیشترین و کمترین ابزار انسجام به کار رفته بودند. در سخنرانی سوم نیز، عناصر پیوندی بیشترین و معرفگی کمترین ابزار انسجام بودند و در سخنرانی چهارم ارجاع بیشترین و معرفگی کمترین ابزار انسجام به کار رفته بودند. در راستای تحلیل آماری دقیقتر و یافتن معناداری در توزیع ابزارهای انسجام در هریک از سخنرانیها، از آزمون مجذور کای استفاده گردید. بر اساس نتایج به دست آمده در سطح p<0.05 میان توزیع ابزارهای انسجام به کار رفته در هریک از سخنرانیها تفاوت معناداری وجود دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

مدیریت دولتی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Content Analysis of Cohesive Devices in the Lectures of Tadbir and Omid Government in the Field of Macro Management of Government Organizations, the First and Second Term of the Presidency

نویسنده [English]

Yousef Hazrati

Assistant Professor, Department of linguistics, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

In the current research, the content of the lectures of Tadbir and Omid government in the field of macro management of government organizations, the first and second term of the presidency, were analyzed from the perspective of the application of cohesive devices and in the framework of the role orientation of Halidi and Hassan (1976). The research was conducted in a descriptive and analytical way, and its content was four lectures in the field of macro management of government organizations, which were randomly selected. Cohesive devices were extracted in four lectures and their frequency was measured. The percent of occurrence of each device was also obtained. After checking the data, it was determined, the first lecture with 474 items, the second with 444 items, the fourth with 421 items, and the third with 411 items are in the first to fourth ranks in the application of cohesive devices, respectively. In the first lecture, reference was the most and knowledge and time were the least cohesive devices. In the second lecture, repetition and introduction were the most and the least cohesive devices, respectively. In the third lecture as well, conjunctive elements were the most and knowledge was the least cohesive devices and in the fourth lecture, reference was the most and introduction was the least cohesive devices. In order to perform a more detailed statistical analysis and find significance in the distribution of cohesive devices in each of the lectures, the chi-square test was used. Based on the results obtained at level p<0.05 there is a significant difference between the distribution of cohesive devices used in each of the lectures.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Cohesive devices
Tadbir and Omid Government
Management
Organization

مراجع

Ahmadi, A.R., & Ostwar, A. (2011). Textual cohesion special characteristics for knowing styles of Persian literature, Journal Of Linguistic and Rhetorical Studies, 2(3), 7. (In Persian)

Arnold Bloor, T, & Bloor, M. (2004). The Functional Analysis of English. London: Longman.

Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (2004). The Functional Analysis of English. London: Arnold.

Faruzandeh, M., & Bani-Talebi, A. (2013). Devices for creating textual coherence and rhetorical continuity in Weiss and Ramin. Magazine: Poetry Research, 6(2), 107-138. (In Persian)

Green, K. & libhan, G. (2004). Literary criticism course. Trans. Bahrani. M. Leila. firth edition.Tehran: Journalist's publication. (In Persian)

Hafez Shamsuddin Mohammad (2003). Diwan edited by Mohammad Qazvini and Mohammad Ghani. Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance. Tehran. (In Persian)

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English, London: Longman.

Jambi, A. (2001). Principles and Fundamentals of Management. Scientific Publications Center, 11th edition. (In Persian)

Kai, J. (2008). Lexical cohesion patterns in NS and NNS dissertation abstracts in applied linguistics: A comparative study. Linguistics Journal, 3(3), 132-144.

Karlsson, S. (2015). Advertising as Discourse. Bachelor Thesis, Linnaus University, Sweden.

Khanian, H. (2017). Analyzing textual coherence factors in Khanleri's "Eagle" poem based on the theory of Michael Halliday and Roghieh Hassan. Quarterly Journal of Studies in Lyrical Literature and Language, 8(26), 55- 72.

Leech, G. N. (1966). English in advertising: A linguistic study of advertising in Great Britain. London: Longman.

Liles, B. Z. (1985). Cohesion in the narratives of normal and language-disordered children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 28(1), 123-133.

Liles, B. Z., Duffy, R. J., Merritt, D. D., & Purcell, S. L. (1995). Measurement of narrative discourse ability in children with language disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 38(2), 415-425.

Lotfipour, K. (2013). . Lotfipur Sa'edi. Principles and methods of translation (English translation course). Publications of Payam Noor University, 12^th Edition. (In Persian)

Lyons, J. (1997). Semantics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mirzapour, F., & Ahmadi, A. (2011). Study on Lexical Cohesion in English and Persian. Research Articles (A Comparative Study).

Modaresi, F., & Mokhbar, S. (2012). Textual coherence in Shams-Tabriz’s Articles. Journal of Literary Criticism and Rhetoric, 1(1), 45 - 72. (In Persian)

Palmer, Frank. R. (2002). New Look to Semantic. Translation by kourosh Safavi, Printed in Tehran, Center publication.

Purcell, S. L., & Liles, B. Z. (1992). Cohesion repairs in the narratives of normal-language and language-disordered school-age children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 35(2), 354-362.

Rahimian, J., Alavi Moghadam, S.B. (2017). Evaluating the use of lexical coherence tools in Persian textbooks of junior high school. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 7(15), 77 - 96. (In Persian)

Razi Nejad, S.M. & Tusinasrabadi, M.-R. (2014). Collection of articles of the 10th International Conference on the Promotion of Persian Language and Literature of Mohaghegh Ardabili University. (In Persian)

Rezaian, A. (2008). Organizational Behavior Management, The Organization for Researching and Composing University textbooks in the Humanities (SAMT). (In Persian)

Rostambeik Tafreshi, A., Hajirezaie, A., Assi, M., & Pahlevanzadeh, M. (2017). An Analysis of the Development of lexical cohesion in Persian -Speaking Students’ Written Discourse. Language Related Research (LRR), 8(1), 179-205. (In Persian)

Sadeghi, M. (2019). Grammatical Cohesion in Persian and English Advertising (Case Study: Food Products). Language Science, 7(12), 215-242. (In Persian)

Safavi, kourosh. (2000). An Introduction to Semantics, Tehran: Soore Mehr Publication. (In Persian)

Sareli, N. Q., & Ishani, T. (2011). The Theory of Cohesion and Cohesive Harmony and The usage of it in a minimal story: The Tale of a Ladder. Zabanpazhuhi2(4), 51-77. (In Persian)

Sattari, R. & Haghighi, M. (2015). Evaluation Techniques of Creating Coherence in Poems of Kaiser Aminpour Relying on the Theory of Halliday’s Linguistics. Literary Arts, 8(1), 103 – 120. (In Persian)

Sediqifar, Z., Rahimian, J., & Khormaei, A.R. (2020). Corpus based investigating of cohessive patern in scientific discourse in persian: Applied approach in teaching persian for academic purposes. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 10(2), 183-212. (In Persian)

Strong, C. J., & Shaver, J. P. (1991). Stability of cohesion in the spoken narratives of language-impaired and normally developing school-aged children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 34(1), 95-111.

Tavousi, M., & Zarezardini, A. (2020). Analysis of Surah Al-Hujurat based on the components of text coherence, Journal of Stylistic Studies of the Holy Quran, 5(9), 103-122. (In Persian)

Tehrani Thabet, N. (2017). Lexical coherence devises in Modern poetry. Practical Rhetoric & Rhetorical Criticism, 5(1), 521-521. (In Persian)

Van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Some Aspects of Textgrammars The Hague Mouton, 1972 Text and Context.

مدیریت سازمان‌های دولتی

تحلیل محتوایی ابزارهای انسجام در سخنرانی‌های دولت تدبیر و امید در حوزۀ مدیریت کلان سازمان‌های دولتی، دوره اول و دوم ریاست جمهوری

مراجع

مراجع

دوره 11، شماره 4 (پیاپی 44) - شماره پیاپی 44
آبان 1402
صفحه 1-20

تحلیل محتوایی ابزارهای انسجام در سخنرانی‌های دولت تدبیر و امید در حوزۀ مدیریت کلان سازمان‌های دولتی، دوره اول و دوم ریاست جمهوری

مراجع

مراجع

دوره 11، شماره 4 (پیاپی 44) - شماره پیاپی 44آبان 1402صفحه 1-20

دوره 11، شماره 4 (پیاپی 44) - شماره پیاپی 44
آبان 1402
صفحه 1-20