با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن مدیریت دولتی ایران و انجمن مدیریت رفتار سازمانی

نوع مقاله : اکتشافی

نویسندگان

1 استاد، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

4 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف طراحی و اعتبارسنجی مدل سمبل‌گرایی سازمانی در سازمان‌های دولتی استان ایلام صورت گرفت. این پژوهش از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و از نظر شیوه جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از نوع اکتشافی است که با رویکرد آمیخته (کیفی- کمی) مورد تحلیل قرار گرفته است. در مرحله اول جهت شناسایی مؤلفه‌های الگو، از روش کیفی و مصاحبه‌های عمیق استفاده شد. مشارکت‌کنندگان در بخش کیفی، 12 نفر از خبرگان دانشگاهی و متخصصان دستگاه‌های اجرایی استان ایلام بودند که به روش هدفمند انتخاب شدند. در مرحله دوم جهت برازش الگوی طراحی شده در بخش کیفی، از روش کمی و رویکرد مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد. جامعه آماری این بخش شامل مدیران و کارشناسان حوزه اداری و منابع انسانی دستگاه‌های دولتی استان ایلام بودند که 188 نفر به روش تصادفی طبقه‌ای انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها در این بخش پرسشنامه 71 سؤالی محقق ساخته بود که روایی و پایایی آن مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. تحلیل داده‌های بخش کیفی به روش کدگذاری و با استفاده از نرم‌افزار مکس کیودا و تحلیل داده‌های بخش کمی با نرم‌افزار اسمارت پی. ال. اس. انجام شد. براساس یافته‌های پژوهش، 71 کد اولیه و 12 مقوله فرعی در قالب 6 مقوله اصلی شناسایی شد که عبارت‌اند از: پدیده محوری، شامل مؤلفه سمبل‌گرایی سازمانی؛ عوامل علی، شامل مؤلفه‌های مدیریتی، قانونی، دانشی و فردی؛ عوامل بسترساز، شامل مؤلفه‌های فرهنگ‌سازمانی و سبک رهبری؛ عوامل مداخله‌گر، شامل تعدد و تناقض قوانین سازمانی؛ راهبردها، شامل راهبردهای سمبل‌گرایانه و پیامدها، شامل مؤلفه‌های بهبود عملکرد سازمانی، توسعه فردی و سازمانی و اعتماد عمومی به سازمان می‌باشند. نتایج بخش کمی الگوی طراحی شده از تناسب قابل‌قبولی برخوردار است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Design and Validation of Organizational Symbolism Model in Government Organizations of Ilam Province

نویسندگان [English]

  • alireza mooghali 1
  • Yahya Rostamnia 2
  • Sayd Mohammad Hosein kamani 3
  • Amirhossein Amirkhani 4

1 Professor, Department of Public Administration, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Public Administration, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

The current research was conducted with the aim of designing and validating the model of organizational symbolism in government organizations of Ilam province. This research is exploratory in terms of practical purpose and in terms of data collection method, which has been analyzed with a mixed (qualitative-quantitative) approach. In the first stage, qualitative method and in-depth interviews were used to identify the components of the model. The participants in the qualitative section were 12 university experts and specialists from executive bodies of Ilam province who were selected in a targeted way. In the second stage, quantitative method and structural equation modeling approach were used to fit the model designed in the qualitative part. The statistical population of this department included managers and experts in the administrative and human resources fields of government agencies of Ilam province, and 188 people were selected by stratified random method. The data collection tool in this section was a researcher-made questionnaire with 71 questions, whose validity and reliability were confirmed. Qualitative part data analysis was done by coding method using Max Quda software and quantitative part data analysis was done with SmartPLS software. Based on the findings of the research, 71 primary codes and 12 subcategories were identified in the form of 6 main categories, which are: the central phenomenon, including the organizational symbolism component; Causal factors, including managerial, legal, academic and personal components; Background factors, including the components of organizational culture and leadership style; Intervening factors, including the multiplicity and contradiction of organizational rules; Strategies, including symbolic strategies and consequences, include the components of improving organizational performance, individual and organizational development, and public trust in the organization. The results of the quantitative part of the designed model have an acceptable fit.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Foundation Data Theory
  • Organizational Symbolism
  • Structural Equation Modeling
  • Symbol
Abbasi Sadr, Gh.R., & Rogi, M. (2016). Explaining the Position of Symbol in Organizational Culture Based on the Islamic Point of View, Journal of Islam and Management Research, 5(2), 37.  (In Persian)
Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., Kocoglu, I., & Zehir, C. (2019). The relationship among organizational symbols, firm absorptive capacity, and product innovativeness. Engineering Management Journal31(3), 158-176. DOI: 10.1080/10429247.2019.1624098.
Alwani, S. M., Khanbashi, M., & Bodlai, H. (2014). Explaining the concept of epoch in phenomenological research and its application in the field of entrepreneurship. A quarterly journal of Strategy, 23(2), 241-218. (In Persian)
Anthony, S. O. (2012). Influence of vision and mission statement on organizational effectiveness: an appraisal of a private sector experience in Nigeria. The Pacific Journal of Science and Technology13(1), 389-397.
Asgari, Gh., Maqbul Baarad, A., & Mohammadi, D. (2008). Examining Elements in Iranian Organizations. Journal of Business Management, 7(2), 155-178. (In Persian)
Aslamazishvili, D., Ignatova, V., & Smirnaya, A. (2020, May). Symbolic Leadership in the Organizational Culture in the Context of Transformation. In 6th International Conference on Social, economic, and academic leadership (ICSEAL-6-2019) (pp. 5-10). Atlantis Press.
Aslamazishvili, D., Ignatova, V., & Smirnaya, A. (2020, May). Symbolic Leadership in the Organizational Culture in the Context of Transformation. In 6th International Conference on Social, economic, and academic leadership (ICSEAL-6-2019) (pp. 5-10). Atlantis Press.
Barsky, A. E. (2019). Ethics and values in social work: An integrated approach for a comprehensive curriculum. New York: Oxford University Press.
Buhalis, D., & Sinarta, Y. (2019). Real-time co-creation and nowness service: Lessons from tourism and hospitality. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 36(5), 563-582. doi:10.1080/10548408 .2019 .1592059
Coşar, B., Uzunçarşili, Ü., & Altindağ, E. (2020). Do Not Neglect the Power of Symbols on Employee Performance: An Empirical Evidence From Turkey. SAGE Open10(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440 209 6 7949.
Czarniawska, B., & Gagliardi, P. (Eds.). (2003). Narratives we organize by (Vol. 11). John Benjamins Publishing.
Dandridge, T. C., Mitroff, I., & Joyce, W. F. (1980). Organizational symbolism: A topic to expand organizational analysis. Academy of Management Review, 5(1), 77-82. https://doi. org/10.2307/257806
Esitti, B., & Buluk, B. (2020). Organizational Symbolism: An Overview of the Tourism Industry. Organizational Behavior Challenges in the Tourism Industry, 188-206.
Fatuhi, Mahmoud (2022). Image rhetoric. 7th edition, Tehran, Aghat Publications. (In Persian)
Fotaki, M., Altman, Y., & Koning, J. (2020). Spirituality, Symbolism and Storytelling in Twentyfirst-Century Organizations: Understanding and addressing the crisis of imagination. Organization Studies, 41(1), 7-30.
Fuller, S. R. (2008). Organizational symbolism: a multi-dimensional conceptualization. The Journal of Global Business and Management, 4(2), 168-174. doi: 10.5465/amr.2008.32465742.
Gagliardi, P. (2015). Myths and symbols: Organizational. In P. Bryant & J. Mathews (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 2nd edition, Volume 16. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/ B978-0-08-097086-8.73088-1
Gerevich, J. (2015). Personal motif in art. Psychiatria Hungarica: A Magyar Pszichiatriai Tarsasag Tudomanyos Folyoirata30(2), 114-130.
Gherardi, S., & Turner, B. (1987). Real men don't collect soft data.
Greenblatt, S. (2017). The rise and fall of Adam and Eve. London: Bodley Head.
Gruter, J. K. (2007). Aesthetics in architecture. Translated by Jahanshah Pakzad and Abdul Reza Homayun. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University, Center Printing and publications. (In Persian)
Hurrell, S. A., & Scholarios, D. (2014). The People Make the Brand” Reducing Social Skills Gaps Through Person-Brand Fit and Human Resource Management Practices. Journal of Service Research, 17(1), 54-67. doi:10.1177/1094670513484508
Jafari, A., & Karimi, F. (2016). Professional policymaking in the education system in the third millennium with an emphasis on future studies. Shabak scientific-specialized monthly, 3(29), 47. (In Persian)
Khoshab, A., Alaei, R., Alvi Moghadam, S. M., & Saebi, M. H. (2016). Monitoring rganization of Mashhad Municipality in 2017 Vision. Journal of Progress and Excellence Research, 1(1), 52-70. (In Persian)
Koçoğlu, İ., Akgün, A. E., & Keskin, H. (2016). The collective unconscious at the organizational level: The manifestation of organizational symbols. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences235, 296-303.
Kriz, J. (1988). Facts and artefacts in social science: An epistemological and methodological analysis of empirical social science research techniques. McGraw-Hill.
Lemon, M., & Sahota, P. S. (2004). Organizational culture as a knowledge repository for increased innovative capacity. Technovation, 24(6), 483-498.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1976). Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations (Bergen: Universitetsforlaget, 1976). the same point is stressed in Wilson, Bureaucracy, 55-59.
March, J., & Simon, H.A. (1958), Organizations, New York: Wiley.
Masoumi, Gh.R. (2014). An introduction to the world's ancient myths and rituals. Third edition, Tehran: published by Sore Mehr publishing company. (In Persian)
Mayr, K., & Siri, J. (2011). Management as a symbolizing construction? Re-arranging the understanding of management. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 160-179.
Mohammadi Shahroudi, H., Rahim Nia, F., Malekzadeh, Gho.R., &  Khodaviyan, A.R. (2017). Explaining the characteristics and dimensions of organizational resilience in production organizations facing risks and challenges. Environmental Risk Management, 5(1), 111-126. (In Persian)
 Moradi, F., Alwani, S. M., & Kazemi, A. (2019). Designing a Proactive Organization Model in Iran’s Governmental Organizations. Public Organzations Management, 7(4), 39-54. (In Persian)
Morand, D., & Zhang, L. (2020). The impact of status-leveling symbols on employee attitudes: a moderated mediational analysis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management31(19), 2495-2520.
Morrison, D. E., & Henkel, R. E. (1970), The Significance Test Controversy: A Reader. Chicago: Aldine.
Ojiako, U., & Aleke, B. (2011). Symbols as cultural expressions of technology diffusion. Society and Business Review6(3), 198-213.
Perrow, C. (1979). Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay. New York: Random House.
Rafaeli, A., & Worline, M. (2000). Symbols in organizational culture. Handbook of organizational culture and climate.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview.
Tabatabaei Nesab, S. M., & Abbaszadeh, M. (2019). Investigating the function of symbolism in corporate branding. Farda Management, 19(64), 147-164. (In Persian)
Turner, B. A. (1986). Sociological Aspects of Organizational Symbolism. Organization Studies, 7(2), 101-116.
Westphal, J., & Park, S. H. (2020). Symbolic management: Governance, strategy, and institutions. Oxford University Press.
Williams, D. (2014). Models, Metaphors and Symbols for Information and Knowledge Systems. Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Innovation (JEMI), 10(1), 79-107.