با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن مدیریت دولتی ایران و انجمن مدیریت رفتار سازمانی

نوع مقاله : پیمایشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار، گروه مدیریت کسب‌وکار، جهاد دانشگاهی، ارومیه، ایران.

4 استادیار، گروه مدیریت، واحد بندرگز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بندرگز، ایران.

چکیده

سوداگری پدیده‌ای نوظهور در سیستم اداری عصر جدید است که آثار مخرب آن، سلامت اداره را تهدید کرده و منافع عمومی را تحت‌الشعاع قرار می‌دهد. لذا این پژوهش با هدف ارائه مدل مدیریت سوداگری در سازمان‌های دولتی ایران انجام گرفته است. برای تشکیل گروه خبرگی، تعداد 15 نفر از خبرگان وزارتخانه‌ها و سازمان‌های تابعه که حائز شرایط خبرگی بودند، به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند. برای تست مدل نیز جامعه آماری شامل کارکنان سازمان فناوری اطلاعات ایران به تعداد 800 نفر در نظر گرفته شد. همچنین تعداد 260 نفر با استفاده از جدول مورگان و به روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده به‌عنوان نمونه آماری انتخاب شدند. داده‌های موردنیاز از طریق پرسشنامه محقق‌ساخته گرداوری گردید که روایی و پایایی آن از طریق روش‌های کمی تأیید شد. جهت تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از نرم‌افزار لیزرل و تکنیک دلفی و سیستم استنتاج فازی در قالب نرم‌افزار متلب بهره گرفته شد. نتایج نشان داد مدل دارای سه بعد فردی، سازمانی و فرهنگی است و بعد سازمانی با بارعاملی 83/0 بیشترین سهم را در تبیین سوداگری اداری دارد. همچنین مؤلفه نظام ارزشی فرد با بارعاملی 6/0 بیشترین سهم را در تبیین بعد فردی؛ مؤلفه نظام ارزیابی ناکارآمد با بارعاملی 75/0 بیشترین سهم را در تبیین بعد سازمانی و مؤلفه کوتاه نگری با بارعاملی 75/0 بیشترین سهم را در تبیین بعد فرهنگی دارد. نتایج سیستم استنتاج فازی نیز نشان داد سطح کمینه سوداگری در سازمان 464/0 است و بخش عمده آن ناشی از تمایلات فردی سوداگرانه است. ضمن اینکه مدیریت عوامل سازمانی و فرهنگی تأثیر بسزایی بر کنترل سوداگری اداری دارد. براساس نتایج می‌توان گفت اهتمام به استخدام افراد شایسته و اخلاق‌مدار نخستین گام مقابله با سوداگری اداری است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing Trading Management Model in Public Agencies of Iran, Case Study: Information Technology Organization

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zahra Foroutani 1
  • Atieh Bohrani 2
  • Vahid Hajilo 3
  • Zahra Moghimi 4

1 Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Payame Noor University,Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Payame Noor University,Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Management, ACECR, Urmia, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Bandargaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandargaz, Iran.

چکیده [English]

the health of administration and overshadow public interests. Therefore, this research has been carried out with the aim of presenting a management model of Trading in Iran's public Agencies. In order to form the expert group, 15 experts from the ministries and subordinate organizations who had expert conditions were selected by available sampling method. To test the model, the statistical population including 800 employees of the Information Technology Organization was considered. Also, 260 people were selected as a statistical sample using Morgan's table and simple random sampling method. The required data was collected through a researcher-made questionnaire, whose validity and reliability were confirmed through quantitative methods. In order to analyze the data, Lisrel software and Delphi technique and fuzzy inference system in the form of MATLAB software were used. The results showed that the model has three individual, organizational and cultural dimensions, and the organizational dimension with a factor loading of 0.83 has the largest contribution in explaining administrative Trading. Also, the individual value system component with a factor of 0.6 has the largest contribution in explaining the individual dimension; The ineffective evaluation system component with a factor loading of 0.75 has the largest contribution in explaining the organizational dimension and the short-sighted component with a factor loading of 0.75 has the largest contribution in explaining the cultural dimension. The results of the fuzzy inference system also showed that the minimum level of Trading in the organization is 0.464, and most of it is caused by individual Trading tendencies. In addition, the management of organizational and cultural factors has a significant impact on the control of administrative Trading. Based on the results, it can be said that paying attention to employing competent and ethical people is the first step in dealing with administrative Trading.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Trading Management
  • Public Agencies
  • Fuzzy Inference
Ariely, D .(2014). Behind the curtain of hypocrisy. Translator: Ramin Rambad, Tehran: Maziar Publishing House.
Alavi, M., Faghihi, A., Mosakhani, M., & Najafbeygi, R. (2018). Studying the Roots of Administrative Corruption in Government Organizations of Iran. Iranian Management Sciences Quarterly, 13(49),1-16. (In Persian)
Alvani, M., Qurbanizadeh,V., & Islampanah, M. (2016).Prioritize effective measures to deter corruption by relying on Islamic teachings. Government Management, 9(2), 306-283. (In Persian)
Behbodhi, M., Abzari, M., & Pradeyan, A. (2017). Designing a structural-interpretative analysis model of the effective causes of electronic government corruption in Iran. Iranian Social Issues Survey, 9(2), 63-90. (In Persian)
Bureau of Surveys. (2014). Good governance is the foundation of development. By the efforts of Ahmad Mardi and Jafar Kheirkhahian (editors), the Islamic Consultative Assembly, the Research Center.
Chatterjee, S., Dalman, M. D., & Mookherjee, S. (2020).To short or not to short? Improving morality judgments of short trades and short traders. Journal of Business Research, 114, 173–185.
Choi, P. M. S., Choi, J. H., & Chung, C. Y. (2020). Do individual traders undermine firm valuation? Finance Research Letters, 36, 101567.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed). CA: Sage.
Corruption Perceptions Index 2022, www.transparency.org/cpi.
Darvish, H., & Azimi Zachkani, F. (2015). Investigating the effect of organizational transparency on reducing administrative corruption through the mediation of organizational trust. Journal of public administration, 8(1), 153-166. (In Persian)
Danaei Fard, H. (2003). Anti-corruption strategy: Does information technology reduce corruption? Quarterly journal of humanities teacher, 9(2),101-117. (In Persian)
Danaei Fard, H., Sadeghi, M., & Mostafazadeh, M. (2014). Study and analysis of politicization in political systems. Strategic Management Thought Quarterly, 9(2), 57-86. (In Persian)
Denhardt, B. & Denhardt, J.V. (2000). The New Public Services: Serving Rather than Steering. Public Administation Review, 60(6), 549-559.
Fabrigar, L.R, & Wegener, D.T. (2011). Exploratory Factor Analysis (Understanding Statistics). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Faqihi, A. & Daanifred, H. (2005). Bureaucracy and development in Iran. Tehran: Rasa Publishing House. (In Persian)
Frederickson, H. (1999). Ethics and New Managerialism. Public Administration & Management. An Interactive Journal, 4(2), 299-324.
Ghorbani, A. (2017). Presenting a conceptual framework for processing showcase management theory. Public Organizations Management, 6(4), 151-168. (In Persian)
Ghahramani, M., & Heydari, R. (2012). Investigating the relationship between the health of the administrative system and improving the performance of human resources in financial-government organizations of West Azerbaijan. Quantitative Studies in Management, 4(2), 159-190. (In Persian)
Hallack, J., & Poisson, M. (2007). Corrupt schools, corrupt university. International institute for educational planing, in UNESCO.
Haque, M. Sh. (1997). Incongruity between bureaucracy and society in developing nations: A critique. Peace & Change, 22 (4), 432-462.
Harrison, M. (2003). Can Corrupt Countries Attract Foreign Direct Investment? A Comparison of FDI Inflows between Corrupt & Non Corrupt Countries. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 2(9), 93-100.
Khalid, S. A. & Ali, H. (2005). The Effects of Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Withdrawal Behavior. International Journal of Management And Entrepreneurship, 1, 30 -34.
 
Littrell, f. F. (2007). Influences On Employee Preferences For Empowerment Practices By The Ideal Managerin China. International Jouvnal Of Intercultural Relations, 31, 87-110.
Mansouri, F., Hosseini Qomi, M., & Maslahati, H. (2017). Social contexts of the spread of economic and administrative corruption. Iran's two quarterly social issues, 9(1), 101-123. (In Persian)
Mirzadeh, N., Arab, H., Saadodin, H., & Zargari, H. (2021). Investigating the effect of Machiavellian management and organizational culture on organizational silence, fourth international conference on management, tourism and technology, Malaysia, Penang. (In Persian)
Mottaghi, M.H. (2000). Avoiding success and reaching the limit of incompetence in employees. Management message, 7- 8, 75-92. (In Persian)
Ozer, F. & Cihan, T. (2014).Effect Of Strategic Leadership Style On Firm Performance: A Study In a Turkish SME. Precedia-Social And Behhavioral Sciences, 15, 778 -784.
Patiar, A., & Mia, L. (2009). Transformational leadership style, market competition and departmental performance: Evidence from luxury hotels in Australia. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28(2), 254-262.
Pillay, S. (2004). Corruption–the challenge to good governance: a South African perspective. International Journal of Public Sector Management17(7), 586-605.
Pelletier, K. L., & Bligh, M. C. (2008). The aftermath of organizational corruption: Employee attributions and emotional reactions. Journal of Business Ethics80, 823-844.
Pourezat, A. A., Ghorbani, A., Abdi, J., & Najarshams, F. (2017). Recall of New Spoil System as Administrative Trader. State Management Quarterly, 10(2), 209-226. (In Persian)
Rabiei, A., & Asif, H. (2011). The role of organizational culture in the prevention of administrative corruption. Public Administration, 4(10),45-85.
Reza, K., & Vassilis, S. M. (1988). Delphi hierarchy process (DHP): A methodology for priority setting derived from the heore method and analytical hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 137, 347-354.
Salahipor, V., & Ziaodini, M. (2021). Identification and ranking of factors affecting the emergence of showcase management. Transformative Human Resources Quarterly, 1(3), 1-16. (In Persian)
Sareeal Qalam, M. (2006). Political Culture of Iran. Tehran: Research School of Cultural and Social Studies.
Sun, F., Dutta, S., Zhu, P., & Ren, W.(2021).Female insiders’ ethics and trading profitability. International Review of Financial Analysis, 74, 101710.
Transparency International (b). Corruption Perception Index 2022. Available at: http://www.transparency.org.
Vinzi, V.E., Chin, W.W., & Henseler, J. W. (2010). Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Berlin.
Yacoubi N., & Yousefi Tabas, H. (2014). The health of the administrative system with the approach of implementing the general policies of the administrative system, the study of the effect of the development of electronic government on the promotion of the health of the administrative system from the perspective of Birjand University employees. Administrative Law, 2(7), 113-142. (In Persian)
Zarandi, S., & Mandari, J. (2015). Designing and explaining the optimal model of Islamic organizational culture to deal with administrative corruption in organizations. Organizational Behavior Studies, 5(2), 117-85. (In Persian)