با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن مدیریت دولتی ایران و انجمن مدیریت رفتار سازمانی

نوع مقاله : اکتشافی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه جامعه‌شناسی (جامعه‌شناسی اقتصادی و توسعه)، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه جامعه‌شناسی، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران

3 دانشیار، گروه جامعه‌شناسی، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.

4 استاد، گروه تعاون و رفاه اجتماعی، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.

چکیده

انتشار و دسترسی آزاد به اطلاعات سازمان‌های دولتی توأم با مواظبت دائم و رفع موانع از مسیر آن‌ها، ضامن سلامت جامعه و سازمان است. ازاین‌رو، پدیدة خودسانسوری در روابط عمومی‌های سازمان‌های دولتی را باید یکی از موانع عمده در این مسیر قلمداد کرد که شناخت و واکاوی عوامل و زمینه‌های بروز این پدیده می‌تواند گامی ضروری و مهم در رفع این موانع محسوب شود. این پژوهش با هدف مطالعة عمیق تجارب مدیران روابط عمومی‌های سازمان‌های دولتی شهر یزد، به دنبال کشف و شناسایی عوامل و انگیزه‌های آنان در مبادرت به خودسانسوری است. این پژوهش در چارچوب مطالعات کیفی به روش پدیدارشناختی انجام گرفته و اعتمادپذیری داده‌های پژوهش نیز با استفاده از معیارهای چهارگانة اعتبارپذیری؛ انتقال‌پذیری؛ تأییدپذیری؛ و اطمینان‌پذیری تأیید شده است. یافته‌های پژوهش در 15 مقولة فرعی و 4 مقولة اصلی نمایانگر تأثیر عوامل چهارگانه ناامنی و نیازمندی،  دستورمحوری، تبعیت از گفتمان حاکم و مصلحت‌اندیشی در سطوح فردی، سازمانی، فراسازمانی است. با توجه به سایة سنگین عوامل یاد شده بر دیدگاه‌های مدیران روابط عمومی‌های سازمان‌های دولتی در مبادرت به خودسانسوری، می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که تسهیل جریان اطلاعات به‌عنوان یکی از ضرورت‌های توسعة جوامع، نیازمند توجّه جدّی مسئولان و سیاست‌گذاران کشور به جایگاه و نقش روابط عمومی‌ها در این زمینه است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Phenomenology of Self-Censorship in Public Relations of Government Organizations

نویسندگان [English]

  • Saeed Dashtizad 1
  • Mahnaz Farahmand 2
  • Hossein Afrasiyabi 3
  • Seyed Alireza Afshani 4

1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Social Sciences (Economic and Development), Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

4 Professor, Department of Cooperation and Social Welfare, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

چکیده [English]

Dissemination and free access to information of government organizations with constant care and removal of obstacles related to it guarantees the health of society and the organization. Therefore, the phenomenon of self-censorship in the public relations of government organizations should be considered as one of the major obstacles in this direction. Recognizing and analyzing the causes and contexts of this phenomenon can be a necessary and important step in removing these obstacles. This study was conducted with the aim of in-depth study of the experiences of public relations managers of government organizations in Yazd. It wants to discover and identify their causes and motives in self-censorship. This research has been done in the framework of qualitative studies and in a phenomenological way. The reliability of the research data has been verified based on four criteria of validity; Portability; Verifiability; And reliability. The research findings were classified into 15 sub-topics and 4 main topics. The data show that four factors are influential at the individual, organizational, and extra-organizational levels, including insecurity and need, command-orientation, adherence to the prevailing discourse, and expediency. Considering the great impact of the mentioned factors on the views of public relations managers of government organizations in self-censorship, it can be concluded that facilitating the flow of information as one of the necessities of community development requires serious attention of officials and policy makers to the position and role of public relations.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Self-censorship
  • Public Relations
  • Government Organizations
  • Free Flow of Information
Adamska, K. (2017). Self-censorship in organizations. In D. Bar-Tal, R. Nets-Zehngut, & K. Sharvit (Eds.), Self-censorship in contexts of conflict: Theory and research (pp. 41-60). Springer International Publishing AG.
Afifi, T., & Steuber, K. (2009). The revelation risk model (RRM): Factors that predict the revelation of secrets and the strategies used to reveal them. Communication Monographs, 76(2), 144-176.
Antilla, L. (2010). Self-censorship and cience: A geographical review of media coverage of climate tipping points. Public Understanding of Science, 19(2), 240-256.
Bar-Tal, D., Nets-Zehngut, R., & Sharvit, K. (Eds.). (2017). Self-Censorship in Contexts of Conflict: Theory and research. Springer International Publishing AG.
Cinar, O., Karciogula, F., & Aliogullari, Z. D., (2013). The relationship between organizational silence and organizational citizenship behavior: A survey study in the province of Erzurum, Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99(1), 314-321.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, (3e ed.),Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed, translated by H. Danaeifard, & H. Kazemi, Tehran: Eshraghi Publications. (In Persian)
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. California: Sage.
Harber, K. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1992). Overcoming traumatic memories. In S. A. Christianson (Ed.), The handbook of emotion and memory: Research and theory (pp. 359-386). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Heydaraghaee, Z. (2018). Identify and Explain the Self-censorship Phenomenon in the rganization and Provide a Model for It, Master Thesis in Master of Business Administration, University of Shahrood, Shahrood. (In Persian)
Holloway, I., & Galvin, K. (2016). Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. New York City: John Wiley & Sons.
Horton, John. (2011). Self-Censorship. Res Publica, 17(1), 91-106.
Karimi, Y., Almasi, S., Mohammadi, R., & Fazeli, H. (2016). Study of Divorce Contexts in Divorced Phenomenological Research, Clinical Psychology Studies, 7(25), 191-211 (In Persian)
Kenny, T., & Gross, P. (2008). Journalism in central Asia: A victim of politics, economics, and widespread self-censorship. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(1), 515-525.
Kubey, R.W., & Peluso,T. (1990). Emotional response as a cause of interpersonal news diffusion: The case of the space shuttle tragedy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 34(1), 69-76.
Lee, F. L. F., & Chan, J. (2009). Organizational production of self-censorship in the Hong Kong media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 14, 112-133.
Mahmoudabadi, F. (2018). Self-censorship and related social factors (a case study of the citizens of Yazd), Master Thesis in Social Sciences Research, Yazd University, Yazd. (In Persian)
Matlock, H. N. (2021). Censorship Concerns in College Media: A Multiple Case Study Analysis on the Silencing of Student Journalists, LSU Doctoral Dissertations, Baton Rouge, LA.
Maxwell, J. A. (1996. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach, California: Sage.
Mohammadi, A., Mozaffari, A., & Kharazi M. A. Z. (2019). The Role of News Flow in Public Relations in Community Development, Iranian Journal of Social Development Studies, 11(4) 87-97. (In Persian)
Mohsenian Rad, M., & Kadimi, A. (2009). Pathology of Public Relations in Iran, Social Sciences, 16(47), 123-76.
Morrison, E.W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 173-197.
Morvati, M. R. (2011). The Relationship between Freedom of Expression and Political Development with Emphasis on the Case Study of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Master Thesis in Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran. (In Persian)
Moustakas, C. (1994) Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Nelkin, D. (1995). Selling science: How the press covers science and technology (Revised ed.). New York: Freeman.
Nets-Zehngut, R. (2011). Origins of the Palestinian refugee problem: Changes in the historical memory of Israelis/Jews 1949-2004. Journal of Peace Research, 48(2), 235-248.
Nosrati, M. (2020). An Analysis of the Effects of Totalitarianism and Self-censorship in the Light of Self-criticism. Journal of Poetry Research (Bustan Adab) Shiraz University, 12(43), 262-290. (In Persian)
Olga, D. (2021). New Gatekeepers in Town: How Groups in Social Networking Sites Influence Information Flows in Russia’s Provinces. Social Media + Society, 1(1), 1-11.
Omarzu, J. (2000). A disclosure decision model: Determining how and when individuals will self-disclose. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 174-185.
Open Data Index Report. (2015). Retrieved from: index.okfn.org/place
Open Government Index Report. (2015). Retrieved from: http://worldjusticeproject.org/open-government-index
Papadakis, Y., Peristianis, N., & Welz, G. (2006). Divided Cyprus: modernity, history, and an island in conflict. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Parkin, J. (2015). Thomas hobbes and the problem of Self-censorship. The Art of Veiled Speech: Self-Censorship from Aristophanes to Hobbes, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Polkinghome, D. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry, New York: Suny Press.
Ramsoomair, N. (2019). Sources of Self-Censorship. Society, 56(6), 569-576.
Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S., Halevy, N., & Eidelson, R. (2008). Towards a unifying model of identification with groups; Integrating theoretical perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(1), 280-306.
Rouhani, H. (2018). Speech by the President of the Islamic Republic of Iran at a symposium of senior government officials. Retrieved from https://www.president.ir (In Persian)
Soltanifar, M., & Mazrouei, M. (2011). News Deterrence Criteria in the Press, Media Studies, 6(13), 131-107. (In Persian)
Taghizadeh, S. E. (2016). Study of the relationship between journalists' self-censorship and readers' satisfaction, Master Thesis in Social Communication Sciences, Islamic Azad University, East Tehran Branch, Tehran. (In Persian)
United Nations. (2020). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
Vakola, M., & Bouradas, D. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of organizational silence: an empirical investigation, Employee Relations, 27(5), 44-458.
Wisdom, J., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Mixed methods: integrating quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis while studying patient-centered medical home models. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Wood, P. (2019). Self-Censorship and Freedom. Society, 56(6), 601-606.