با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن مدیریت دولتی ایران و انجمن مدیریت رفتار سازمانی

نوع مقاله : اکتشافی

نویسنده

استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد ممقان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ممقان، ایران.

10.30473/ipom.2026.76966.5293

چکیده

خودکارآمدی، توان سازنده‌ای است که بدان وسیله مهارت‌های شناختی، اجتماعی، عاطفی و رفتاری انسان برای تحقق اهداف مختلف به‌گونه‌ای اثربخش سازمان‌دهی می‌شود. داشتن دانش، مهارت‌ها و دستاوردهای قبلی افراد پیش‌بینی‌کننده‌های مناسبی برای عملکرد آینده افراد نیستند، بلکه باور انسان درباره توانایی‌های خود در انجام آن‌ها بر چگونگی عملکرد خویش موثراست. هدف اصلی پژوهش، طراحی مدل سنجش خودکارآمدی عمومی کارکنان تأمین اجتماعی با رویکرد پدیدارشناسی است. این پژوهش به روش کیفی و با رویکرد پدیدارشناسانه و در فرایند تحقیق، متد کولایزی به‌عنوان مبنا و الگوی اجرای تحقیق به کار گرفته شد. برای گردآوری اطلاعات از مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ ساختاریافته استفاده شد و تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات به روش کیفی انجام گرفت. نمونه‌گیری به روش نظری و با بهره‌مندی از تکنیک‌های هدفمند و گلولة برفی بود که بر مبنای آن مصاحبه با 6 نفر از کارشناسان و خبرگان تأمین اجتماعی با رویکرد پدیدارشناسی که در حوزة علمی و پژوهشی، تجربه و تخصص داشتند، انجام گرفت. نتایج تحلیل داده‌های به‌ دست ‌آمده از مصاحبه‌ها طی فرایند کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی، به ایجاد مدل سنجش خودکارآمدی عمومی کارکنان تأمین اجتماعی با رویکرد پدیدارشناسی منجر شد. در نهایت پیشنهادهای کاربردی برای طراحی مدل سنجش خودکارآمدی عمومی کارکنان تأمین اجتماعی با رویکرد پدیدارشناسی ارائه شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing a Model for Measuring the General Self-Efficacy of Social Security Employees: A Phenomenological Approach

نویسنده [English]

  • Mohammad Bakhtazmay Bonab

Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Mamagan Branch, Islamic Azad University. Mamagan. Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction
General self-efficacy is a constructive psychological capability through which individuals effectively organize their cognitive, social, emotional, and behavioral competencies to accomplish a variety of goals. Rather than knowledge, technical skills, or previous achievements alone, individuals' beliefs in their capabilities determine how successfully they perform their responsibilities and overcome workplace challenges. In organizational settings, particularly within public service institutions such as social security organizations, employees' self-efficacy significantly influences individual performance, organizational commitment, innovation, and service quality.
Despite extensive quantitative research on self-efficacy, limited attention has been given to understanding this phenomenon from the lived experiences of employees. Accordingly, this study seeks to develop a model for measuring the general self-efficacy of Social Security employees using a phenomenological approach.
The study addresses the following research questions:

How do Social Security employees experience the phenomenon of general self-efficacy?
What contextual factors contribute to the development of general self-efficacy?
What organizational actions have been effective in enhancing employees' self-efficacy?
What strategies can improve general self-efficacy among Social Security employees?
What are the individual, group, and organizational consequences of enhanced self-efficacy?

 
Methodology
This study employed a qualitative research design based on descriptive phenomenology. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews using Moustakas' phenomenological method, specifically the modified Colaizzi analytical framework for extracting the essence of participants' lived experiences.
Participants were selected through purposive and snowball sampling. Six experts and senior professionals with extensive scientific, managerial, and practical experience in the Social Security Organization participated in the study. Sampling continued until theoretical saturation was achieved.
Interview data were analyzed using open, axial, and selective coding. Through systematic phenomenological analysis, the textual and structural descriptions of participants' experiences were integrated to identify the essential dimensions of general self-efficacy and construct the final conceptual model.
 
Findings
The analysis revealed five major dimensions of general self-efficacy among Social Security employees.
The first dimension, lived experience of self-efficacy, consisted of three categories:

Individual factors, including personal competencies, professional knowledge, and confidence in personal abilities.
Values and beliefs, including self-confidence, self-esteem, and constructive personal beliefs.
Experiences, including successful job experiences, continuous learning, on-the-job training, and career advancement.

The second dimension identified the contextual and causal factors influencing self-efficacy. These included:

Organizational factors such as organizational vision, employee suggestion systems, and competency assessment.
Organizational support through managerial support, adequate facilities, and management stability.
Career development practices including meritocracy, empowerment, delegation of authority, and competency-based promotion.

The third dimension examined organizational actions for enhancing self-efficacy, which comprised:

Continuous learning through training programs, professional skill development, and knowledge enhancement.
Employee participation through collective decision-making, teamwork, and organizational wisdom.
Emotional intelligence development through self-awareness, self-assessment, and environmental awareness.

The fourth dimension focused on strategies for improving self-efficacy, including:

Building organizational trust among employees, managers, and experts.
Promoting collective self-efficacy through empowerment, collaboration, participation, and social competence.
Supporting professional development by strengthening human resource management, fostering organizational culture, and providing appropriate legal and organizational infrastructures.

The fifth dimension highlighted the outcomes of enhanced self-efficacy, which were categorized into three levels:

Individual outcomes, including increased self-confidence, stronger self-belief, and improved job performance.
Group outcomes, including greater organizational commitment, effective leadership, and knowledge sharing.
Organizational outcomes, including enhanced employee competencies, infrastructure development, improved organizational effectiveness, and greater organizational prestige.

The integration of these dimensions through open, axial, and selective coding resulted in a comprehensive phenomenological model for measuring the general self-efficacy of Social Security employees.
 
Discussion and Conclusion
The findings emphasize that employees' self-efficacy is a multidimensional phenomenon shaped by individual characteristics, organizational context, managerial support, and professional development opportunities. Developing self-efficacy requires more than technical training; it also depends on organizational culture, trust, participation, emotional intelligence, and merit-based management practices.
The findings are consistent with previous international research. Studies by Liu (2020), Dipendra et al. (2019), Cherin and Jacob (2016), Lubbers et al. (2015), Stefano et al. (2013), and Haddad and Abu Taleb (2016) similarly reported significant relationships between self-efficacy and employee motivation, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, health, performance, and professional development. The present study extends these findings by proposing a comprehensive phenomenological model grounded in employees' lived experiences within the Social Security Organization.
 
Practical Implications
Based on the findings, several practical recommendations are proposed to strengthen employees' general self-efficacy:

Establish competency-based performance evaluation systems with measurable organizational goals.
Expand continuous professional development programs tailored to employees' needs.
Create supportive and flexible work environments that encourage innovation, creativity, and knowledge sharing.
Strengthen organizational trust through transparent leadership and participatory management.
Improve organizational culture by promoting collaboration, professional ethics, and mutual respect.
Reform reward and compensation systems to ensure fairness and eliminate discrimination.
Enhance knowledge management through systematic transfer of tacit knowledge and needs-based training.
Utilize modern digital technologies to improve communication, performance management, and organizational learning.
Increase employee participation in decision-making and make greater use of employees' professional and interdisciplinary expertise.
Develop institutional mechanisms for continuous feedback and reflective performance evaluation.

General self-efficacy among Social Security employees emerges as a complex organizational capability influenced by personal competencies, organizational support, learning opportunities, trust, participation, and professional development. The phenomenological model developed in this study provides a comprehensive framework for understanding and measuring this construct within public organizations. The model offers valuable theoretical and practical guidance for policymakers, managers, and human resource professionals seeking to enhance employee effectiveness, organizational performance, and sustainable organizational development through strengthening general self-efficacy.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • General Self-Efficacy
  • Employees
  • Social Security
  • Phenomenological Approach
Ackermann, R., & DeRubeis, R. J. (1991). Is depressive realism real? Clinical Psychology Review, 11(5), 565–584. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(91)90004-e
Ahmadi, D., & Honari-Mehr, M. (2023). Ethical leadership in sustainable organizations: The moderating role of general self-efficacy and the mediating role of organizational trust and employee commitment. 17th International Conference on Management, Economics, and Development, Tehran. (In Persian)
Amirsardari, L., Rahimi, M., Esmaili. A. (2014). Study of Relationship between General Self- Efficiency, Mood and Trait Anxiety among Police Officers. Journal of Police, 3(2), 95-100. Doi: 10.30505/3.2.95
Soleimani, E., & Hoveida, R. (2013). Investigating the concept of self-efficacy in Bandura’s social cognitive theory. Ketab-e Mah-e Olum-e Ejtemaei (Social Sciences Book Review), 63, 91–97. (In Persian)
Asharfian-Sizar, S., & Maghni-zadeh, Z. (2022). Investigating the relationship between self-efficacy and quality of life with components of general health. 1st National Conference on Psychology, Educational Sciences, and Counseling, Urmia. (In Persian)
Bahmani Choub-basti, A., & Rouhi Eramaki, R. (2023). Explaining the role of servant leadership on employee self-efficacy and innovation. 9th National Conference on New Findings in Science and Technology with a focus on Computer, Management, and Accounting, Tehran. (In Persian)
Bailey, T. C., & Snyder, C. R. (2007). Satisfaction with Life and Hope: A Look at Age and Marital Status. The Psychological Record, 57(2), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03395574
Cherian, J., & Jacob, J. (2013). Impact of Self Efficacy on Motivation and Performance of Employees. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(14). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n14p80
Dahling, J. J., Melloy, R., & Thompson, M. N. (2013). Financial strain and regional unemployment as barriers to job search self-efficacy: A test of social cognitive career theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(2), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031492
Daryoush Tavasoli, Hasan Ghalavandi, Mir Mohammad Seyed Abbaszadeh, Abdulzahra Naami, (2016). The Canonical Analysis of the Relationships between Self-efficiency and Organizational Adaptability Capacity, Quarterly Journal Public Administration, 8(26), 325-348. (In Persian) DOI:  10.22059/jipa.2016.59882
Dehghani, E. (2019). Investigating the importance of self-efficacy in academic achievement and academic motivation. National Conference on Professional Research in Psychology and Counseling with a focus on New Achievements in Educational and Behavioral Sciences “From the Teacher’s Perspective”, Minab. (In Persian)
DeMarrais, K., & Tisdale, K. (2002). What Happens When Researchers Inquire Into Difficult Emotions?: Reflections on Studying Women’s Anger Through Qualitative Interviews. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3702_6
Kasari, A. (2025). The role of general self-efficacy, leader-member exchange (LMX), and psychological safety in the development of voice behavior and performance of Kosar University employees. 1st National Conference on the Role of Management and Accounting Sciences in Improving Monetary and Financial Policies, Sari. (In Persian)
Keshtvarz kondazi, E.,   Barzegar, M., & Shokouhi, M.J.  (2020). Intermediary Role of Self-Efficacy and Academic Self-Regulation in the Relationship between Self-Esteem and Happiness. Journal of Instruction and Evaluation, 13(51), 95 – 131. (In Persian) DOI:  10.30495/jinev.2020.1899279.2183
Khaki, G. (2016). Research Method with an Approach to Thesis Writing. Tehran: baztab Publications. (In Persian)
Liguori, E. W., Bendickson, J. S., & McDowell, W. C. (2017). Revisiting entrepreneurial intentions: a social cognitive career theory approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0462-7
Liu, I.-F. (2020). The impact of extrinsic motivation, intrinsic motivation, and social self-efficacy on English competition participation intentions of pre-college learners: Differences between high school and vocational students in Taiwan. Learning and Motivation, 72, 101675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2020.101675
Lubbers, R., Loughlin, C., & Zweig, D. (2005). Young workers’ job self-efficacy and affect: Pathways to health and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.03.002
Mirkamali, S.M., Narenji Thani, F., & Alami, F. (2012). A study of the relationship between transformational leadership and organizational learning (Case of: Saipa Company)Transformation Managemet Journal, 3(2), 1. (In Persian)  https://doi.org/10.22067/pmt.v0i0.15935
Mirzazadeh, H. (2021). Investigating the impact of self-efficacy on organizational agility. 1st International Conference on Research Findings in Management, Economics, and Accounting, Tehran. (In Persian)
Mohsenpour, Z., & Gudarzi, R. (2021). Investigating the impact of general self-efficacy on the financial performance of managers and employees of banks in Kazerun. Monthly Journal of New Achievements in Humanities Studies, 4(43), 42-60. (In Persian)
Momeni, M. S. (2023). Investigating the impact of social responsibility in Marand Municipality on employee commitment considering the mediating role of self-efficacy belief. 10th National Conference on New Studies and Research in the Field of Humanities, Management, and Entrepreneurship of Iran, Tehran. (In Persian)
Moustakas, C. E. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Sage Publications.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
Nazari, kh., &   Moosavi, A. (2023).  Studying the Role of Spiritual Leadership and Managers' Self-efficacy in Schools' Organizational Agility. Journal of Educational and Scholastic Studies, 11(4), 75-103. (In Persian) DOR: 20.1001.1.2423494.1401.11.4.4.2
Safarazi, M., & Gholipour, V.  (2023). Investigating the Effect of Job Regeneration on the Innovative Behavior of Employees with Regard to the Mediating Role of Perceived Self-Efficacy in the Social Security Organization of Shiraz City. Journal of Behavioral Srudies in Management, 14(33), 93-112. (In Persian)
Shirzad, I., & Jalali Farahani, M. (2021). The Relationship between General Self-Efficacy and Job Satisfaction in Iran Successful Sport Federations. Sport Management, 13(1), 85-97. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/jsm.2021.222318.1743
Singh, D., Barreda, A. A., Kageyama, Y., & Singh, N. (2019). The Mediating Effect of Financial Self-Efficacy on the Financial Literacy-Behavior Relationship: A Case of Generation Y Professionals. The Economics and Finance Letters, 6(2), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.29.2019.62.120.133
Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. [Albany NY]: State University of New York Press, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315421056
Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2006). Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. Routledge.
Zahedi-far, R., Izadi, M., Zamani, M., Halako, K., & Tajari, M. (2025). Developing employee self-efficacy. 12th National Conference on Advances in Positive Psychology, Bandar Abbas. (In Persian)